Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/05/28 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was discharged for homosexual admission but received a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. He did not have any Articles 15, received many awards, including an ARCOM with valor, served in Iraq and is now being treated for PTSD.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050415
Discharge Received: Date: 050504 Chapter: 15-3b AR: 635-200
Reason: Homosexual Admission RE: SPD: JRB Unit/Location: Rear Detachment, 3-7 IN Bn, Fort Stewart, GA
Time Lost: 54 days, AWOL (050125-050320), mode of return is unknown.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 21
Current ENL Date: 030812 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 07Mos, 00Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 03Mos, 27Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA 011113-040421/HD (Immediate Reenlistment)
Highest Grade: E-5 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B10/Infantryman GT: 121 EDU: GED Overseas: SWA Combat: Iraq (021120-030811)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM-2, AAM, PUC, NDSM, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, CIB, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Savannah, GA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 15 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for engaging in, attempting to engage in, or soliciting another person to engage in homosexual acts, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 2005, in a sworn statement, the applicant had admitted to having engaged in homosexual acts and engaged or had the propensity to engage in homosexual/bisexual acts. He was advised of his rights.
On 20 April 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 25 April 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service as general under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 15 of that regulation states that active homosexuality is incompatible with military service and provides, in pertinent part, for the separation of members who actively engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct. The Army regulation states that when the sole basis for separation is homosexuality, a discharge under other than honorable conditions may be issued only if such characterization is warranted in accordance with Chapter 3, Section III, and if there is a finding that during the current term of service the Soldier attempted, solicited, or committed a homosexual act by using force, coercion or intimidation; with a person under 16 years of age; with a subordinate in circumstances that violate customary military superior subordinate relationships; openly in public view; for compensation; aboard a military vessel or aircraft; or in another location subject to military control if the conduct had, or was likely to have had, an adverse impact on discipline, good order, or morale due to the close proximity of other Soldiers of the Armed Forces. In all other cases, the type of discharge will reflect the character of the Soldiers overall record of service.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records and the issue and documents submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.
The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission. The analyst further noted that the applicant had waived an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable. The applicants request about his contingency waiver was not addressed and this constitutes a violation of the applicants rights.
Further, the analyst noted the applicants issue about rejoining the Service. However, at the time of discharge he was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. At this time, a reentry code of 4 for homosexual admission cannot be waived. If the applicant wishes to rejoin the Service he should check with a recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that relief be granted in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 5 January 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, VA medical records (26 pages), NCOER, character reference letters.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service is improper. The Board noted that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, by reason of homosexual admission with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The board noted the applicants conditional waiver was not addressed as required by AR 635-200. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to honorable. However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 5 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100015820
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016649
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 September 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived her right to an administrative separation board, contingent upon her receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than an honorable discharge and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015941
The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003829
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 June 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, on the condition that he receive an honorable discharge and did not a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009893
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant was not properly notified as to the reasons why she would not get an honorable discharge as specified in paragraph 15-4, AR 635-200. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013733
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, volontarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than honorable, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Homosexual Admission" and the separation code is "JRB." Board Action Directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000104
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070628 Discharge Received: Date: 070906 Chapter: 15-3b AR: 635-200 Reason: Homosexual Conduct (Admission) RE: SPD: JRB Unit/Location: U.S. Army Recruiting Company Redlands, U.S. Army Recruiting Battalion Southern California, Redlands, CA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The Board will consider any aggravating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009479
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for having created a rebuttable presumption that indicated she had the propensity to engage in homosexual or bisexual acts, with an honorable discharge. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012280
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Separation for Homosexual Admission and the separation code is "JRB." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015733
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant was not properly notified as to the reasons why she would not receive an honorable discharge as specified in paragraph 5-1b, AR 635-200. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007642
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...