Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012884
Original file (AR20100012884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/04/13	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant, states, in effect, that he has been a law abiding citizen (criminal and drug free) since his discharge and requesting a discharge upgrade to assist him in pursuing employment. He is not asking for any benefits from the government and would like to rejoin the military but is ineligible.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   N/A

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 030616
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 030708   Chapter: 14-12c(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: D Battery 1/1 ADA, Fort Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 021105, wrongfully used cocaine (020916 & 020923); reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $552 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 030504; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030424, wrongful use of Xanax (030201), confinement for 15 days and forfeiture of $575 pay per month for one month.(SCM)

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 010814    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 10Mos, 25Days Moral Waiver for possession of marijuana (001201)
Total Service:  		01 Yrs, 10Mos, 25Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 14T10 Patriot Missile Crewmember   GT: 118   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  New Castle, IN
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 16 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of xanax and cocaine, with an other than honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 18 June 2003, the applicant waived consultation with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 27 June 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 07 January 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: N/A 

Exhibits Submitted: None

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  


        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: N/A										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: N/A






Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100012884
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008848

    Original file (AR20080008848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The board recommended that the applicant be discharged with issuance of a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 22 December 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020128

    Original file (AR20090020128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 28 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006298

    Original file (AR20080006298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 19 April 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for disobeying orders from NCOs, failing to pay just debts, and for numerous failures to repair, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016741

    Original file (AR20070016741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 10 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018945

    Original file (AR20070018945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 6 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011575

    Original file (AR20080011575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 11 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011287

    Original file (AR20070011287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 23 January 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008350

    Original file (AR20080008350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 28 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005968

    Original file (AR20090005968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 September 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that on the applicant's DD Form 214 block 27, reentry eligibility (RE) code reads "3," however, the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008085

    Original file (AR20090008085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for receiving two Field Grade Articles 15 for using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 July 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the...