Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/04/13 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she requests an upgrade of her discharge to general, under honorable conditions.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 070209 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Failed Medical/Physical/Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: C Co, 369th Signal Bn, Fort Gordon, GA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 34
Current ENL Date: 060801 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 09 Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-060720-060731/NA
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 108 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Couer D'Alene, ID
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The complete facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. However, the evidence of record does show that on 17 January 2007, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge. On 2 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
Furthermore, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature. The DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failed medical/physical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized.
Further, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFW (i.e., failed medical/physical procurement standards), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." On 6 February 2007, Orders 037-0901, DA, U.S. Army Installation Management Command, HQS, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Gordon, Fort Gordon, GA, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date: 9 February 2007.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the complete facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army, however the applicants record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicants signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failed medical/physical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized. In connection with such a discharge, the proceedings of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) would have revealed that the applicant had a medical condition that was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty.
Subsequently, competent medical authority would have had to approve the findings of the EPSBD. The applicant would have had to agree with the findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army.
A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.
The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 5 January 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (100320).
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100012742
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011572
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016067
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/11/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 061122 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failed Medical/Physical/Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: B Co, 232d Medical Training Bn, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NOne Counseling Records Available: Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004790
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018966
Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a document, subject: Counseling Reference EPSBD Proceedings, in which the Applicant stated he had been counseled about his rights in connection with processing of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) and had been informed he did not meet procurement medical fitness standards at the time of his enlistment. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the Applicants record and his service did not warrant an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005398
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011499
The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012488
However, the record shows that on 29 April 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a right shoulder instability, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The characterization of service for Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010547
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110020263
Applicant Name: ????? A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001219
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...