Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/03/25 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant in effect requests an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable based on his disability as the cause of his actions on active duty. Also, the applicant contends he was diagnosed with depression and prescribed medication for treatment.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: None
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 081020
Discharge Received: Date: 081114 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: A Btry, 2-29th FA Bn, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080823, willfully disobeying a lawful order; reduction to E-3 (suspended), forfeiture of $843 pay x 2 months (suspended), extra duty for 14 days, and restriction for 14 days (CG). This Article 15 is not part of the available record, see unit commander's recommendation memorandum.
080331, willfully disobeying a lawful order; extra duty for 7 days (Summarized). This Article 15 is not part of the available record, see unit commander's recommendation memorandum.
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 051019 Current ENL Term: 03 Years 21 Weeks/with an approved moral waiver (051005)
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 26Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 26Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 13D10 Field Artillery Automation GT: 99 EDU: GED Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (061029-071210)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ICM-W/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, VUA
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: El Paso, TX
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 20 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for disobeying a lawful order x 3 (080331), (080823), (080723); committing assault consummated by battery (060915), (080212), (080519); and failing to report x 2 (080731), (080926), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 23 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The applicant's record contains two Military Police Reports, dated 11 February 2008 and 19 May 2008, with additional offenses, victims, and persons related to the report.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst acknowledges the independent document (Department of Veterans Affairs) submitted with the application indicating that the applicant was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), claimed as anxiety and depression, determined to be service connected and rated as 50% disabling.
The applicant's available record does not contain any evidence of in-service diagnosis of depression as indicated in the independent documentation from the Department of Veterans Affairs and the applicant did not submit any corroborating evidence of in-service diagnosis of depression or related medical issues.
Further, the record further shows that the mental status evaluation did not indicate that his condition was a contributing factor to his misconduct, there is no evidence of mental disease or defect, which would warrant a disposition through medical/physical channels. He was cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by command.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 2 June 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted DD Form 149 and the following documents: DD Form 214, dated (081114); Discharge Orders 317-0013, dated (081112); and a Waco VA Regional Office Rating Decision (11) pages, dated (100219).
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100011917
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013096
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-serious offense, for willfully disobeying a lawful order on three occasions (080331, 080823, 080723), failing to report to his designated place of duty two times (080723, 080731), and for assault and battery on three occasions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010444
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 May 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SPC/E-4 ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009456
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 October 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of a serious offense (wrongfully used marijuana between (961212-960716) and damaged another soldier's private property while engaged in a physical altercation, used provoking words and assaulted two unknown males, and were drunk...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100020872
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 July 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority documents are not in the available record; however he would have approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004828
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013804
The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007564
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 3 September 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009483
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 May 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013178
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for conviction by Summary Court-Martial of indecent assault x 2, disobeying an order from a Commissioned Officer, assaulting a NCO, and dereliction of duty, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013366
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 May 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.