Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/03/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he wants his discharge upgraded to honorable and give him the Iraq Campaign Medal and Southwest Asia Service Medal. He has under gone rehabilitation for cannabis and alcohol dependence, and has been clean for 4 years and dry for 2 years. He has married, has a child, bought a home and is employed full time building MRAP vehicles. The Iraq Campaign Medal and the Southwest Asia Servcie Medals were authorized after he got out.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 041208
Discharge Received: Date: 050125 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 2nd Brigade, APO AE Germany
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 041019, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (040722-040823), (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 020206 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman GT: 112 EDU: College Transcript Overseas: Korea, Southwest Asia Combat: Iraq (030427-040710)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM (2), AAM (3), NDSM, GWTSM, GWTEM, KDSM, ASR, OSR (2), USSMDL, CIB
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant stated that he has under gone rehabilitation for cannabis and alcohol dependence, and submitted the documents to support his claim.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (040722-040823), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he wants his discharge upgraded to honorable and would like to receive the Iraq Campaign Medal and Southwest Asia Service Medal; he has under gone rehabilitation for cannabis and alcohol dependence, and has been clean for 4 years and dry for 2 years. He is married and has a child, brought a home and is employed full time building MRAP vehicles. The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted the accomplishment outlined in his application and in the documents with his application.
However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Further, the Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to restore former service member's medals. The Board may only change the characterization or reason for discharge. If an applicant believes there is an error or injustice in his discharge, he then may make an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, utilizing a DD Form 149, which can be obtained online or from veterans assistance offices.
Therefore, the analyst determined tahta the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 8 November 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 in lieu of a DD Form 293 dated 2 March 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100011625
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009780
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 1 Mos, 15 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016145
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 July 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine between (040810-040823), driving while intoxicated (051217), AWOL (060201-060203), wrongfully operate a vehicle without a valid USAREUR license (060423), and made a false official statement to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008871
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (absent without leave 7 to 13 January 2004, disobeying superior commission officer and noncommissioned officer on 5 January 2004, failure to report for accountability formation on 1 October 2003, failure to report for work call on 2 October...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015599
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011221
Applicant Name: ????? Total time lost was 138 days. On 28 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016045
Applicant Name: ????? Before initiating action to separate the applicant, the command ensured the applicant was appropriately counseled about the deficiencies, which could lead to separation. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017230
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- commission of a serious offense for having communicated a threat, wrongfully providing alcoholic beverages to a minor, and assaulting another Soldier, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014300
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 March 2007 , the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor pattern of failing to report to your appointed place of duty on time on multiple occasions, have had a serious lack of motivation, difficulty following orders and have even gone AWOL twice, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014466
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 10 Mos, 19 Days ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board does not condone the applicant's misconduct, however the Board determined that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008508
On 24 February 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The unit commander's recommendation and the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...