Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/02/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states: "I request to have my Separation Code, Reentry Code and the Narrative Reason for Separation changed on my DD Form 214. I feel that there was an injustice as I was considered to have been in sound condition when I was examined, accepted and enrolled for service, except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at entrance into service at the Kansas City MEPS. 38 CFR 3.304(b) Presumption of Soundness.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 100124 Chapter: 4-24b(4) AR: 635-40
Reason: Disability, Existed Prior to Service, PEB RE: SPD: JFM Unit/Location: C Co, 506th Inf, Fort Campbell, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 21
Current ENL Date: 081027 Current ENL Term: NIF Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 28Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA-070105-081026/HD
Highest Grade: E4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B10/Infantryman GT: 100 EDU: NIF Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Kansas City, KS
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which the applicant was unavailable for signature. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-40, Chapter 4, paragraph 4-24b(4) by reason of disability, existed prior to service, PEB, with a characterization of service of honorable.
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFM (i.e., Disability, Existed Prior to Service, PEB) with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." On 22 December 2009, DA, HQ, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY, Orders 356-0605, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of: 24 January 2010.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability. Chapter 4, provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers found to be unfit by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) due to a condition which occurred in line of duty and not due do to the Soldiers misconduct. Paragraph 4-24b(4) provides that Soldiers not having sufficient time in service for retirement would be separated by reason of disability without severance pay because of a condition that existed prior to military service. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. The service of Soldiers in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized. A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the applicant's narrative reason for discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army. However, the applicants record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, paragraph 4-24b(4), AR 635-40, by reason of disability, existed prior to service, PEB, with a characterization of service of honorable.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue reference changing his narrative reason for discharge, separation code, and reentry code. However, the narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Disability, Existed Prior to Service, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) the separation code is "JFM," and the reentry code is "RE 3."
Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes. The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized. There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.
At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
The applicant contends that he was considered to have been in sound condition at entrance into the service. However, the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army. If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Boards consideration.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 3 December 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, discharge orders, dated 22 December 2009, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100009388
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014188
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (4) by reason of a disability condition that existed prior to entry, without severance pay, and with an honorable characterization of service. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Disability Existed Prior to Service, PEB and the separation code is "JFM."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016042
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 January 2009, Medical Evaluation Board diagnosed the applicant with a medical condition that made him unfit to perform his military duties and referred him to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Disability Existed Prior to Service, PEB and the separation code is "JFM." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012354
Chapter 4, provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers found to be unfit by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) due to a condition which existed prior to service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018230
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009149
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130009149 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070882C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The PEB indicated that his condition existed prior to his service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. That regulation shows that a soldier discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(4), because of a disability that existed prior to service will have a SPD code of “JFM” entered on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017081C070206
Dennis Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged from active duty on 23 July 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 4-24b(4) based on disability, existed prior to service, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) with an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010896
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 13 Days ????? A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000234
He indicated that the applicant had been diagnosed with epilepsy seizures and that due to this condition he was no longer able to perform his duties as a transportation driver. AR 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The "JFM" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012679
His DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile) stated, in pertinent part, that he required an MEB based on category E scoring on the Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for physical disability which existed prior to service. While it is clear that the applicant was granted a waiver for his hearing loss in order to enlist in the Army, evidence of record clearly shows...