Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018031
Original file (AR20090018031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/10/13	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has always dreamed about being the first in his family to go to college. He joined the Army to receive the college benefits. He has served for over half of his term and believes that the discharge he received was not right. He has been home for two months and his life is hard right now with the economy the way it is. He would like to be able to go to college and better his education.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090602
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090626   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: B Company, 94th Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry), Fort Polk, LA 

Time Lost: Military confinement from (090521-090528) for 8 days; as part of the punishment imposed from the Summary Court-Martial. 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090521, Summary Court-Martial for being disrespectful in language toward SFC, a noncommissioned officer on or about 080807, unlawfully grab a PFC torso and arms from behind on or about 080805, willfully and unlawfully seize and hold a PFC against his will on or about 080805. He was sentenced to reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of pay per month for one month, and confinement for 15 days. 

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 070118    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  24 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 1 Days The applicant required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (060501)
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 1 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mech   GT: 101   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (071128-081230)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ICMDLw/CS, ASR, OSR, CAB, MUC

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he abused illegal drugs; between on or about (090127-090226), wrongfully used marijuana on (090521), and on 090521, he was found guilty of two counts of disrespect toward a noncommissioned officer, one count of assault, consummated by battery, and one count of kidnapping at a summary court-martial, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights. 
       
       The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 18 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. 
       
       The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he has been home for two months and his life is hard right now; and with the economy the way it is, he would like to be able to go to college and better his education.  Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 11 August 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.





VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change


























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090018031
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000276

    Original file (AR20120000276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4".

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016588

    Original file (AR20100016588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he fired a BB Gun in the Fort Polk cantonment area, committed sodomy with another Soldier, and multiple counts of failing to report for duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021683

    Original file (AR20110021683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for being found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial (090521), for disobeying a commissioned officer and for being drunk and disorderly, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011519

    Original file (AR20110011519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 July 2010, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the board; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016295

    Original file (AR20080016295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019682

    Original file (AR20110019682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one incident that occurred during treatment at an inpatient alcohol rehabilitation clinic in Korea. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014931

    Original file (AR20110014931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he assaulted a noncommissioned officer (080724), failed to report for duty (081009), and received nonjudicial punishment for several acts of misconduct of failing to report to duty on time. The intermediate commander...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007695

    Original file (AR20120007695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 March 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service, but suspended it for a period of six (6) months. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry eligibility (RE) code is RE 4.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024811

    Original file (AR20110024811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090202 Discharge Received: Date: 090309 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: Rear Detachment Company, 4th Brigade Special Troops Battalion, Fort Carson, Colorado Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090606, incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021338

    Original file (AR20110021338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 January 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."