Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016679
Original file (AR20090016679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/09/22	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is an upstanding citizen who holds a steady job and pay his taxes. He doesn't wish to carry around this bad mark on his otherwise clean record. He doesn't deserve to be black listed his whole life due to an indiscretion.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090205
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090212   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: Comanche Troop, 8th Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090205, Wrongfully used marijuana between on or about 081101-081202; wrongfully used marijuana between on or about 081110-081210; the continuation sheet (DA Form 2627) is not part of the available record; forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Article 15, 081118, Wrongfully used marijuana between on or about 080908-081009; reduction to Private (E-1); forfeiture of $350.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

The suspension of the punishment restriction for 45 days imposed on 081118 was vacated, based on the applicant's offense of with intent to deceive, made to 1LT, an official statement, which was false on or about 081201. 

The unit commander's recommendation for separation action indicates the applicant received a Summarized Article 15; however, the Article 15 and the charges are not part of the available record, but the punishment imposed was: extra duty and restriction for 14 days.  


Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  27
Current ENL Date: 070104    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  19 Weeks/The applicant required an administrative waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (061113).
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 1 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 1 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19D10 R4 Cavalry Scout   GT: 103   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 5 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs; in that he tested positive for marijuana on 081009; 081202; 081210; 081229; and on 081230; also, he lied to a commissioned and noncommissioned officer about his whereabouts on 081201, by stating that he was given quarters when in fact he never reported to Okubo Clinic, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. 
       
       He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  
       
       The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 6 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. 
       
       The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is an upstanding citizen who holds a steady job and pay his taxes and he doesn't want to carry around this bad mark on his otherwise clean record.    The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and the applicant is to be commended for his efforts.  However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 21 July 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change














Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090016679
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019980

    Original file (AR20090019980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020900

    Original file (AR20120020900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012674

    Original file (AR20100012674.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully appropriation of a POV (090124), and testing positive for marijuana (090429), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012082

    Original file (AR20090012082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 8 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the issue the applicant submitted does not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012041

    Original file (AR20090012041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted the follwing documents: DD Form 149, dated (090701); Statement from Applicant's Mother, dated (090701); Letter Citing Attachments; Timeline of Events; Letter from Commanding General, Fort Jackson, SC,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021138

    Original file (AR20110021138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using illegal drugs, receiving two Article 15s (081209, 090114) for wrongful use of marijuana, being AWOL two times (081104-081109 and 081201-081203), and failing to report two...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014317

    Original file (AR20100014317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011639

    Original file (AR20100011639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015174

    Original file (AR20090015174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 2009, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007830

    Original file (AR20100007830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 8 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...