Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016141
Original file (AR20090016141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/09/15	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: 'When discharge I was suppose to be medicaly discharged but I wasn't.  I also finished my basic and AIT, all 14 weeks as was removed from Echo Co and moved to Delta.  My DD Form 214 should say honorable reason under medical."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 060719
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060727   Chapter: 11-3       AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct	   RE:     SPD: JGA   Unit/Location: D Co, 2/19th Inf, ITB, Fort Benning, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: 060308    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  19 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 04Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 04Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 100   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 19 July 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, paragraph 11-3, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for refusing to train (060702, 060705, and 060707), with an uncharacterized discharge.
       
       He was advised of his rights.  The applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an uncharacterized discharge.  On 22 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of the regulation applies to Soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service.  The regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge for separation under this Chapter.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the documents, and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS).  
       
       The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  
       
       A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and the former Soldier’s service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  
       
       The narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this chapter is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," the separation code is "JGA," and the reentry code is "RE 3."  Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28, separation code, entered in block 26, and RE Code, entered in block 27 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.  
       
       The applicant requests that the narrative reason be changed to medical, however, the record does not support the applicant’s contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge, the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 July 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA



























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090016141
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007043

    Original file (AR20100007043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for use and possession of illegal drugs in that he tested positive for cocaine at a unit urinalysis (080104) and received an Article 15 for cocaine (080131), with an entry level separation, uncharacterized discharge. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012698

    Original file (AR20090012698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "Was not able to complete entry level training, due to injury incurred during basic training road march. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to pass the Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003649

    Original file (AR20080003649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003264

    Original file (AR20090003264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 December 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for academically failing the 91B10 course and refusing to accept the 57E10 MOS offer due to low test scores, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007858

    Original file (AR20090007858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019508

    Original file (AR20080019508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016111

    Original file (AR20070016111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on (date not in file), the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 16 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011662

    Original file (AR20060011662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 August 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (you have no desire to successfully complete basic training, motivation level has been nonexistant and performance has been below average), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010072

    Original file (AR20060010072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 961011 Discharge Received: Date: 961023 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013354

    Original file (AR20080013354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 May 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for refusing to restart, the lost of motivation and for going AWOL, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of...