Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015955
Original file (AR20090015955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/09/14	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she requests an upgrade of her discharge to fully honorable and she served more than 180 days at time she was separated for medical reasons.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090804   Chapter: 5-17     AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not A Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: D Co, 232nd Med Bn, Fort Sam Houston, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: 090202/OAD    Current ENL Term: 00 Years  26 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 06Mos, 03Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 10Mos, 16Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	ARNG 080919-090201/NA
                                         (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: NIF   EDU: 13 Years   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's release from the Army (Active Duty Training ADT), are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature. 
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of condition, not a disability, with service uncharacterized.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFV (i.e., condition, not a disability), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."  
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, unless properly notified of the specific factors in his/her service record that warrant such characterization. For ARNGUS and USAR Soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant’s record does not contain the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her release from the Army.  
       
       However, the  record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of condition, not a disability, with an uncharacterized separation of service.  
       
       A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200, also provides except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  Absence evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant’s separation was initiated while he was still in entry-level status and the applicant’s separation was accomplished within 72 hours following approval by the separation authority. 
       
       The analyst acknowledges that at the time of discharge the applicant had completed a total of 6 months and 03 days of active military service.  However, barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst presumed governmenrt regularity in the discharge process and determined that the applicant's separation was initiated while she was still in entry-level status. 
       
       A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.   
       
       The applicant's issue was carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether her issue has merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 July 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: State of Connecticut
                Department of Veterans Affairs
                55 West Main Street Suite 140
                Waterbury, CT 06702 

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted a DD Form 214, dated (090804).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090015955
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009323

    Original file (AR20090009323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ???? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Therefore, the analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011035

    Original file (AR20080011035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant in which she states, "I was discharged because of a CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY with an UNCHARACTERIZED Discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004952

    Original file (AR20090004952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017136

    Original file (AR20080017136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080017136 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001624

    Original file (AR20130001624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR 635-200, paragraph 5-1, states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013546

    Original file (AR20080013546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080013546 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015184

    Original file (AR20090015184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023707

    Original file (AR20110023707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that during her training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, she was sexually assaulted and the command covered it up. The applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity and she has not provided any documentation or further evidence in support of her request for an upgrade of her discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018938

    Original file (AR20110018938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025227

    Original file (AR20100025227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with bilateral foot pain, left ankle stress fracture, not resolving with conservative treatment for the past 5 weeks; which, she did not have prior to service. Board...