Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015337
Original file (AR20090015337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/09/01	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: "I would like another chance at being a great soldier.  I need to upgrade my discharge since I cannot seem to get a waiver to get back in service.  During the time out of the Army thus far I have straightened out my attitude and went back to school.  At this time I have 16 college credits and wish continue becoming a better person and soldier in the US Army."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070323   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 627th Movement Control Team, APO AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 050512    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 10Mos, 12Days ?????
Total Service:  		01 Yrs, 10Mos, 12Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88N10/Traffic MGT Coord   GT: 99   EDU: GED   Overseas: Germany   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states that he has completed 16 college credits.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the Army.  However,the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., pattern of misconduct) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3".  Further, evidence of record show that on 20 March 2007, DA, Bamberg Transition Center, APO AE, Orders 79-01, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date: 23 March 2007.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant issue that he wants another chance at being a great Soldier, and cannot seem to get a waiver to get back in the service.  However, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.”  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
       
       Furthermore, the applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 July 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA






























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090015337
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004013

    Original file (AR20090004013.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for multiple violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 May 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008532

    Original file (AR20100008532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for having been disrespectful in language toward a noncommissioned officer and a warrant officer (080212), failing to report to his appointed place of duty x 6 (080227, 080409, 080411, 080825, 080911, and 080920), and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006417

    Original file (AR20090006417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b for pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during the period of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007050

    Original file (AR20090007050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged under provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b (Patterns of Misconduct), AR 635-200 with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002029

    Original file (AR20090002029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 December 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011250

    Original file (AR20090011250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I believe that even though my conduct in the army was not becoming during my time in service several times, I have learned from my mistakes to become a better person and should not be looked upon badly by the U.S Army that I proudly served and wish to serve in once again. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006615

    Original file (AR20090006615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct in that he disrespected a superior noncommissioned officer, twice breaking restriction imposed by a CG and FG Article 15, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011485

    Original file (AR20090011485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011952

    Original file (AR20090011952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 6 August 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 15 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018339

    Original file (AR20100018339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/19 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG...