Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013860
Original file (AR20090013860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/08/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has 7 years of good service, one deployment, activated for both hurricane katrina and rita, and made one mistake and regret it. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080729
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 081008   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHB, 3rd Battalion, 6th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, Fort Bliss, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080618, Wrongfully used marijuana between on or about 080429-080528, reduction to Specialist (E-4), forfeiture of $1,067 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 081218, extra duty for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: 070516    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  23 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 4 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Total Service:  		5 Yrs, 4 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	ARNG 011220-020902/NA
                                       ADT    020903-030326/HD
                                       ARNG 030327-031019/NA
                                       AGR    031020-031121/NA
                                       ARNG 031122-031219/NA
                                       ADS    031220-050310/HD
                                       ARNG 050311-050923/NA
                                       AGR   050924-051009/NA
                                       ARNG 051010-060418/NA
                                       AGR   060419-060712/NA
                                       ARNG 060713-070515/NA
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 14E10 Patriot FC Operator   GT: 120   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (040715-050216-prior svc)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, ASR, OSR, NESVCMALw/9111CLSP, AFRMw/M Dev, ARCAM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 29 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; abuse of illegal drugs, in that he tested positive for marijuana on 080528, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights. 
       
       The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent uponn him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. 
       
       The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 19 September 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. 
       
       The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue and considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge. 
       
       Further, even though a single incident, the analyst concluded that the discrediting entry constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of soldiers in the Army.  The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. 
       Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicant's single incident of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 9 June 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted two copies of his DD Form 214, and a copy of his Enlisted Record Brief in support of his records review.  

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090013860
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007552

    Original file (AR20090007552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007056

    Original file (AR20100007056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080723 Discharge Received: Date: 080804 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: 488th QM Co, 88th BSB, Ft. Polk, LA Time Lost: Civilain confinement (080518-080523). Therefore, the analyst recommends an administrative change to the applicant's DD Form 214 to separation authority 14-12c, SPD code JKQ and RE code 3 per the separation authority's directive. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012993

    Original file (AR20070012993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and indicated she would submit a statement in her own behalf however, the statement is not part of the available record. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000127

    Original file (AR20090000127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016077

    Original file (AR20080016077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019338

    Original file (AR20100019338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 050618 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Abuse of Illegal Drugs) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: A Co, 1-131st In Regt, Fort Polk, LA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050413, wrongfully used marijuana (041224-050124); reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $668 pay x 2 months, extra duty for 45 days, and restriction for 45 days, (FG). The DD Form 214 indicates the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012195

    Original file (AR20110012195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for having wrongfully used marijuana between (070113 and 070213), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issues of wanting to get back into the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007561

    Original file (AR20090007561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014397

    Original file (AR20070014397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110021445

    Original file (AR20110021445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 2011/10/25 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized, if the Soldier is in entry-level status. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears based on the discharge orders that the reason for discharge and the...