Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011462
Original file (AR20090011462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/07/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states "I was discharged for reasons that I had already been punished for. I had received E-grade reduction just months before my discharge for the same reason of discharge. I had not been in any trouble after my grade reduction. I had filed a sexual harrassment EEO complaint and feel that it may have played a part in my being asked to leave the military. 

I have since the military been in school and have recieved my AS in Medical Billing and Coding and is currently working on my BA in Health Information Management with the intent to graduate in May 2010. Upon completion of school I intend on applying for jobs to include federal employment and I do not want "Under Honorable Conditions (General)" to hinder my success by preconcieved notions and perceptions. I am a changed person on the road to success with a family. So I hope to have this changed to help me on my pathway to success."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 031215
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 040218   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: Medical Company, US Army Medical Department Activity, Fort Benning, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030603; disrespectful in language and deportment toward MSG, a noncommissioned officer on or about 030507; reduction to Private First Class (E-3); forfeiture of $356.00 pay suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 031203; extra duty for 14 days (CG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: Reenl/010801    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service:  		5 Yrs, 7 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 980710-010731/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91G10 Patient Administrative Spec   GT: 98   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Korea (91123-010121) prior service   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states that she has earned her AS in Medical Billing and Coding and is currently working on a BA in Health Information Management with the intent to graduate in May 2010.  

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that she received a Article 15 for insubordination, repeated occurrences for domestic violence and repeated occurrances for indebtedness, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  On 3 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 
       
       The record contains a Military Police Report dated 17 December 2002. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that a sexual harrassment complaint she filed played a part in her being asked to leave the military.  The the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.   
       
       The analyst congratulates the applicant on her work achievements since departing the Army.  However, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Further, the record shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct” and the separation code is "JKA."  
       
       Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 26 May 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: N/A

Witnesses/Observers: N/A 

Exhibits Submitted: None

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090011462
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002246

    Original file (AR20090002246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; although the applicant alleges that she was a victim of sexual harrassment during her military service, there is no evidence in her military records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence supporting this contention. Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022240

    Original file (AR20110022240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving three Article 15s for failing to report and since the Article 15s his conduct has gotten worse, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016111

    Original file (AR20080016111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving a Company Grade Article 15 for disobeying a lawful order from a NCO, dereliction of duty, loitering and wrongfully sitting down on her guard post, disobeying a lawful command from a CPT,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010622

    Original file (AR20080010622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Suffered more for the actions of that sargeant then I should have. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080010622 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020104

    Original file (AR20080020104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003598

    Original file (AR20090003598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ?? On 27 January 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010464

    Original file (AR20070010464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 and supporting document submitted by the Applicant. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019308

    Original file (AR20110019308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? With a higher education, I hope to be able to continue to assist military service members and their families. On 23 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016070

    Original file (AR20070016070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct —for repeated acts of disrespect toward NCOs and for failure to obey lawful orders multiple times, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016621

    Original file (AR20090016621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 March 2004, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...