Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008407
Original file (AR20090008407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 090427	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See attached DD Form 293 and supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant's attorney-in-fact, who states, "My husband's narrative reason for his separation to his dd214 in block 28 did not include his diagnoses of the following, his paranoidd schizophrenia, and his secondary diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060106   Chapter: 4-24b(2)    AR: 635-40
Reason: Disability, Temporary	   RE:     SPD: SFK   Unit/Location: HHC, 2-34th AR, Ft. Riley, KS 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 040603    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 07 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Total Service:  		05 Yrs, 09 Mos, 22 Days Applicant's DD Form 214 indicates the Applicant was placed on the retired list in the grade of E4/Spec.
Previous Discharges: 	USAR/ARNG - 000315-040914/HD  Concurrent Service
                                       IADT - 000518-001122/HD
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91W  Health Care Spec   GT: 101   EDU: GED   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (050115-050815)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ARCAM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Lake Dallas, TX
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
The Applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the Applicant's signature.  That DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 24b(2) by reason of disability, temporary, with a characterization of service as an honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of SFK (i.e., disability, temporary).  On 28 December 2005, Department of Army, Headquarters, 24th Infantry Division (Mech), Fort Riley, Kansas, issued orders 362-0014, which placed the Applicant on the Temporary Disability List with an effective date of retirement from the Regular Army of 6 January 2006.  The period of disability retirement was designated to be 2 years, 3, months, 5 days after which time the Applicant's medical retirement status will be re-evaluated.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability.  Chapter 4, provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers determined to be unfit to perform their military duties due to a condition which occurred in line of duty and not due do to the Soldier’s misconduct.  Paragraph 4-24b(2) provides that the requirements for placement on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) are the same as for permanent retirement in that the Soldier must be unfit to perform his duties at the time of evaluation and that the condition must be determined to be temporary or unstable.  The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the Applicant’s available military records, and the issue submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change in the narrative reason for separation of the Applicant's discharge.  The Applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the Applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the Applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  That DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (2) by reason of disability, temporary, with a characterization of service as honorable.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of SFK (i.e., disability, temporary).   The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the Applicant were fully protected through the separation process.  Therefore, the narrative reason for separation of service remains both proper and equitable. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 19 June 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.










  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change NA    No change NA
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Chane
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090008407
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | ar20090008328

    Original file (ar20090008328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the applicant. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013244

    Original file (20070013244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 confirms that the applicant was separated from active duty under the provision of paragraph 4-24b(2) of Army Regulation 635-40 (Personnel Separations) by reason of disability, temporary. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Evidence of records confirms the applicant's separation was accomplished in accordance with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065073C070421

    Original file (2001065073C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 28 of her DD Form 214 should show the entry “Temporarily Retired due to Disability” instead of the entry “Disability, Severance Pay.” In support of her application, she submits copies of: her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History); DA Form 5181-R (Screening Note of Acute Medical Care); Medical...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014188

    Original file (AR20080014188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (4) by reason of a disability condition that existed prior to entry, without severance pay, and with an honorable characterization of service. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Disability Existed Prior to Service, PEB” and the separation code is "JFM."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018678

    Original file (AR20070018678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 24b(5) by reason of disability, other, with an honorable characterization of service. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(5) by reason of disability, other, with an honorable characterization of service. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the narrative reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006404

    Original file (AR20090006404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 24b (3) by reason of disability, severance pay, with an honorable characterization of service. Paragraph 4-24b(3) provides that Soldiers not having sufficient time in service for retirement would be separated by reason of disability with severance pay. The PEB would have recommended separation with severance pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016434C080407

    Original file (20070016434C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 8 May 2003. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his disability retirement also shows that based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of SFK in Item 26 (Separation Code) and an RE code of 4 in Item 27 (Reentry Code). The applicant's contention that his disqualification should not prevent him from reentering military...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010896

    Original file (AR20060010896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 13 Days ????? A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 1 August 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090862C070212

    Original file (2003090862C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Inasmuch as he was not serving on active duty at the time he was removed from the TDRL and was placed on the PDRL, he was not authorized to have a new DD Form 214 issued or to have his last DD Form 214 changed to reflect his current status, because the DD Form 214 is only issued to reflect the most...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000242

    Original file (AR20080000242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 July 1998, the PEB determined the Applicant's injury prevented reasonable performance of duties required by grade and military specialty. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40 will normally be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...