Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007833
Original file (AR20090007833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/05/04	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080610
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080718   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: Rear Det, 4/9th Inf, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070217, Wrongful use of cocaine between (070101 and 070104), reduction to E1; forfeiture of $650.00 pay per month for two months (suspended); 45 days extra duty; 45 days restriction (suspended), (FG).

080407, Wrongful use of cocaine between (080228 and 080303), reduction to E1; forfeiture of $673.00 pay per month for two months; 45 days extra duty; and 45 days restriction, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 060715    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 00Mos, 04Days ?????
Total Service:  		04 Yrs, 06Mos, 13Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA-040106-060714/HD
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10/Infantryman   GT: 105   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Korea, Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (050915-060914)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR-2, CIB, ICM (w/2 bss)

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Thornton, CO
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed









VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       Evidence of record shows that on 10 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs (080303) for testing positive for cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 27 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  The applicant provides no issues of equity or propriety for consideration by the Board.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 5 February 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.




        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090007833
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003765

    Original file (AR20090003765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "In March of 2008, I failed a drug test and was discharged in August of 2008. On 20 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006602

    Original file (AR20090006602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020958

    Original file (AR20090020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008258

    Original file (AR20090008258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017505

    Original file (AR20080017505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006970

    Original file (AR20090006970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse),...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009889

    Original file (AR20090009889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 4 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012338

    Original file (AR20090012338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080207 Discharge Received: Date: 080303 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct, (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: 600th QM, 7th Trans Bn, Fort Bragg, NC Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for a total of 100 days; 20 days (070718-070806), mode of return unknown; 80 days (071106-080124), mode of return unknown. On 12 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004610

    Original file (AR20090004610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008864

    Original file (AR20090008864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...