Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007563
Original file (AR20090007563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/04/13	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080517   Chapter: 13       AR: 135-178
Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: 366th CM CO, Ft Stewart, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 020911    Current ENL Term: 8 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	5 Yrs, 08Mos, 07Days ?????
Total Service:  		5 Yrs, 08Mos, 07Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92Y10 Unit Supply Specialist   GT: NIF   EDU: Hs Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NIF

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Savannah, GA
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 17 May 2008, DA HQS, 335th Signal Command (Theater), East Point, GA discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 17 May 2008, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The record contains a properly constituted Order as described above.  Further, on 17 May 2008 the separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of paragraph 13-1, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army Reserve.  Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the USAR.  Paragraph 13-1 of that regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for being an unsatisfactory participant.   Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  On 17 May 2008, DA HQS, 335th Signal Command (Theater), East Point, GA discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 17 May 2008, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.  
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 22 January 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090007563
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 2 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100030274

    Original file (AR20100030274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is to my understanding that the Army has enacted the Lodging in Kind policy for soldiers who travel greater than a 50 mile radius to drill unit effective 26 May of 2008. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000162

    Original file (AR20110000162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? So I spkoe (sic) with my squad leader to see what documents I needed to bring to my next drill and @ the Jan. drill I brought my pregnancy profile and proof of pregnancy as I was told. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002559

    Original file (AR20080002559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2007, the unit commander (LTC, CA, USAR, Commanding), notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for failure to report for more than nine unit training assemblies, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002460

    Original file (AR20130002460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on 6 September 2002, for a period of 8 years. On 16 November 2007, the approving authority directed that the applicant be separated from the US Army Reserve with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge and reduced to PVT/E-1 under the provisions of AR 600-8-19, paragraph 10-1d. The evidence of record shows that the period of service under review indicates the applicant was...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007915

    Original file (AR20080007915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Total Service: 04 Yrs, 08Mos, 07Days the analyst utilized applicant's enlistment contract and the separation order for computation of period of enlistment under review and the total service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015466

    Original file (AR20080015466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 050630 Chapter: 13 AR: 635-200 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 307th MP Co, (CBT SPT), New Kensington, PA Time Lost: None Listed Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008374

    Original file (AR20120008374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, as stated by the applicant, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004614

    Original file (AR20080004614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit a change to the applicant's narrative reason for reassignment to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement), from his prior unit of assignment, 339th MC Co HUB, Oakdale, PA, by reason of unsatisfactory participant. The analyst...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018187

    Original file (AR20090018187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014746

    Original file (AR20100014746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was discharged for missing drills but would now like to reenlist and can’t do it with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, as...