Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/03/03 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 020130 Chapter: 8-26K AR: NGR 600-200
Reason: Unsatisfactory Participant RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 50th Support Bn, NJ ARNG, West Orange, NJ
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 960423 Current ENL Term: 8 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 5 Yrs, 09Mos, 08Days ?????
Total Service: 5 Yrs, 09Mos, 08Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ADT 960717-961205/UNC
(Concurent Service)
Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 63B/Light Wheeled Mech GT: 88 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, ARCOTR, NJMA
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Newark, NJ
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence shows the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army. The record indicates that on 4 February 2002, State of New Jersey, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as reserve of the Army, effective 30 January 2002, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26K, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3."
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Paragraph 8-26k of that regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for being an unsatisfactory participant. Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records. On 4 February 2002, State of New Jersey, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, effective 30 January 2002, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participant, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a Reenlistment Eligibility Code of RE 3. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue and determined at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 20 November 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090006542
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016053
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the State of Michigan Army National Guard. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011263
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions, and a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009459
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participant, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002251
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020021
Applicant Name: ????? It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004050
It indicates that the applicant was discharged from the Massachusetts Army National Guard under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, for unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reentry eligibility code of 3. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Discussion,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020023
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I was under the impression that I was on the Inactive National Guard List. The NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-26k, NGR 600-200, for unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007421
Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070112 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006164
Current ENL Service: 06 Yrs, 06Mos, 03Days ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006164aC071121
This document indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3". c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the...