Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/06 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he needs the G.I. Bill to enroll in a college and cannot receive the G.I. Bill benefits without the change of his discharge.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 061025
Discharge Received: Date: 061116 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Troop, 1/6 Cavalry Regiment, Fort Carson, CO.
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060804, Wrongfully used marijuana between on or about 060410-060510; reduction to the grade of Private (E-1); forfeiture of $636.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days; (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 040602 Current ENL Term: 4 Years He extended for 15 months on 060311 to meet SRR for Life Cycle Unit, while assigned to the 3rd ACR, Fort Carson, CO. His new ETS date is: 090901.
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92A10 Automated Logistical Spec GT: 109 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Iraq (050303-060308)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWTSM, ICMDL, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed on the DD Form 293.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 25 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he tested positive for marijuana on 060717, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper. The analyst noted that the government introduced into the discharge packet the results of a command directed competence for duty (i.e., fitness for duty) biochemical test. This is limited use information as defined in Chapter 6, AR 600-85. Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable characterization of service. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 9 October 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the government introduced the results of a command directed urinalysis into the discharge process. This is limited use information as defined in Chapter 6, AR 600-85. Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 5 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20090002388
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014235
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "Im trying to upgrate my discharge into an Honorable Discharge because the status of my discharge at the moment is under honorable conditions. On 12 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003380
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for testing positive for cocaine (051116) and for being AWOL (060124 - 060323), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012898
The applicant waived consulting with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 8 January 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014768
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 Februay 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010927
On 16 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,under honorable conditions. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006329
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 20 November 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000641
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 June 2001, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12C, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor having tested positive for illegal use of marijuana on 27 February 2001 and 26 April 2001, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013484
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 011030 Discharge Received: Date: 020320 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: B/204th Forward Support Bn, Fort Hood, TX 76544 Time Lost: AWOL 5 days (010131-010204), civilian confinement 56 days (001107-001113 and 010619-010806). On 2 November 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013745
The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard State of Minnesota for six years (050714), was ordered to active duty and served in Iraq and received numerous awards and decorations. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, submitted a statement in his own behalf and understood that he was receiving a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 May 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000612
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his cas by an administrative...