Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002325
Original file (AR20090002325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/06	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The Applicant provided no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the board. See enclosed DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 960607   Chapter: 14-12B       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKB   Unit/Location: HHC, Headquarters Support Troops, US Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 951003, Summarized ART 15 without authority failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty; 14 days extra duty and restriction (CG).

960329, willfully and wrongfully destroyed a telephone handset, a value of less than a $100, assaulted a private by grabbing her buttocks, assaulted a private by shaking him, drunk and disorderly, and failure to obey a written lawful order; reduction to E1 (suspended), forfeiture of $500 of pay (suspended), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 931118    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 6Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 6Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 75E10 Personnel Actions Spc   GT: 91   EDU: HS Transcript   Overseas: Korea   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, OSR, NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Belleville, NJ
Post Service Accomplishments: Nothing provided by the Applicant. States he wants to rejoin the military service.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
             The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of under other than honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKB (i.e., misconduct).  
       
       The record contains an approved Bar to reenlistment dated 951020 and a Military Police Report dated 960313.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of  the applicant’s military records and issues submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during the period of enlistment under review is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12B by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.”  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 091016         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA














VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090002325
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015288

    Original file (AR20080015288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Except for the forgoing modification to the applicant's Separation Authority, Separation Code (SPD), and the Reentry Eligibility (RE) code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018433

    Original file (AR20070018433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040901 Discharge Received: Date: 041207 Chapter: 8-26g(3) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Defective Enlistment Agreement RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: TRP C 1-18th CAV, Ontario, CA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007703

    Original file (AR20090007703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-5, AR 635-200, in that he was convicted of operating a vehicle under the influence in Maine on (020221), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016128

    Original file (AR20080016128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010178

    Original file (AR20090010178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 Oct 08, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003829

    Original file (AR20090003829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 25 June 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, on the condition that he receive an honorable discharge and did not a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008595

    Original file (AR20090008595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010488

    Original file (AR20090010488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006746

    Original file (AR20090006746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 January 2009 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006426

    Original file (AR20090006426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the applicant was discharged by...