Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/02/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "Dear sir/mam,
Thank you for taking the time to consider my possible discharge change. I worked long and hard while in the army and was a model Soldier. I excelled in basic training, and at my permanent duty station. I always gave 110%, was respectful to my commanding officers, and wore my uniform with pride. While in kuwait I did everything I could to keep the moral high among my fellow Soldiers. It was the best time of my life. I was assigned a new squad Sgt. upon return from Kuwait. His name was Sgt. Santana, I knew from day one he didn't like me. I fell behind on my mortorcycle payments, and that was all he needed to begin the end of my military career. I worked hard and was finally get my bills corrected, when my Platoon Sgt. had me report to the motorpool office. He told me to leave, just leave. I asked why, with the fear of court martial or a dishonorable discharge. He said they were sick of me and he would see to it I had a fair discharge. I requested to talk with the chaplain, and my C.O. Nobody listened, and I left.  I reported to Ft. Sill, O.K. as directed. Five days later, I was given a failure to adapt disharge with over two years of proud service. I would re-enlist today if given the chance. I was fully prepared to devote my life to the Army, looking forward the advancement and oppurtunities of serving my country. I gave so much over those two years, and feel my case was handled poorly. Thank you for taking the time to review my service history. An honorable discharge would mean the world to me, and give me the oppurtunity to re-enlist. Jason L. Mullin."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 991028
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 991117   Chapter: 10      AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: Service Btry, 2-82 FA Bn, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL for 38 days (990611-990718), surrendered. 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The unit commander mentions in the recommendation memorandum that the applicant received two Article 15s; however, those Article 15s are not part of the available record.

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 970319    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 06Mos, 21Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 06Mos, 21Days Includes 118 days of excess leave (990723-991117)
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 13B10/Cannon Crewmember   GT: 110   EDU: GED   Overseas: The applicant claims that he served in Kuwait; however, his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not support this contention.   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR




V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Jacksonville, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 22 July 1999, the applicant was charged with AWOL (990611-990719).  On 22 July 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 2 November 1999, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue and the accomplishments outlined in the application he submitted.  However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.  Further, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Additionally, the analyst determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.  Finally,at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the  reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 9 October 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090002244
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 pages