Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001555
Original file (AR20090001555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/10/10	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade so that he may enlist in the service for a second time.  Also, that his reentry code be down graded to at least a three.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 040210
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 040510   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: Alpha Battery, 1st Battalion, 39th Field Artillery, DIVARTY, 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Stewart, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 031015, Failed to go to his appointed place of duty (030922); reduction to Private (E-2); forfeiture of $301.00 pay per month for one month, (suspended); to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (040101); extra duty and restriction for 14 days (CG)

031212, Wrongfully used marijuana between (031003-031103); reduction to (E-1); forfeiture of $575.00 pay per month for 2 months; 1 month suspended for 120 days; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 020711    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 10 Mos, 0 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 10 Mos, 0 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 13R10 FA Firefinder RDR Operator   GT: 98   EDU: GED Certif   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (030109-030603)
Decorations/Awards: AAM, PUCA, NDSM, GWTEM, GWTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 10 February 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he tested positive for marijuana on (031103), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 16 April 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service, to include his reentry eligibility (RE) code was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 5 August 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA 



















VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090001555
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022128

    Original file (AR20110022128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 May 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, for testing positive for marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 May 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006484

    Original file (AR20090006484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ?? The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life to include his current service in the National Guard; however, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024148

    Original file (AR20100024148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 27 February 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board even though he was not entitled to a board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004977

    Original file (AR20090004977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 February 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c (1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for being absent without leave x5 (031009-031020), (031022-031029), (031101-031104), (031107-031203) and (031203-040122); disobeying a commissioned officer (031009); disobeying a noncommissioned officer x3 (030609)...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002415

    Original file (AR20090002415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018474

    Original file (AR20080018474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2), by reason of misconduct (i.e., abuse of illegal drugs), with a characterization of service of general,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006082

    Original file (AR20090006082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006970

    Original file (AR20090006970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse),...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001571

    Original file (AR20090001571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, with a recommendation to retain her in the United States Army. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015108

    Original file (AR20080015108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general,...