Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000455
Original file (AR20090000455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/12/05	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF  Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 970804   Chapter: 14       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 390th Signal Co, Schofield Barracks, HI 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  22
Current ENL Date: 941117    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 08Mos, 18Days ?????
Total Service:  		06 Yrs, 03Mos, 26Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA-910409-941116/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74C10 Record Telecommunication Center Operator   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Hawaii   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM-2, AGCM, NDSM, ASR, OSR, ASUA 

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Washington, DC
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct-pattern of misconduct), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of " 3."  On 13 May 1997, DA, HQ, 25th Infantry Division (Light) and U.S. Army Hawaii, Schofield Barracks, HI, Orders A133-02, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date:  4 August 1997.  
       
       The applicant's record contains a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand dated 28 October 1996 for driving under the influence of alcohol (Administrative).

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14,  Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under  honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, and found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.  Further, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3.”  If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 18 May 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 










        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20090000455
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015247

    Original file (AR20080015247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 970822 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HHC, 1-27 IN Bn, Schofield Barracks, HI Time Lost: AWOL for 3 days (970422-970424), mode of return unknown. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct, with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005924

    Original file (AR20110005924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016163

    Original file (AR20110016163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect that he is applying for a state job as a prison guard. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019844

    Original file (AR20080019844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010084

    Original file (AR20120010084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016348

    Original file (AR20070016348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 Septemeber 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024136

    Original file (AR20110024136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022246

    Original file (AR20120022246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? He wasn't as mentally messed up as he told some of the doctors but his chain of command was trying their hardest to get me kicked out dishonorably. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000393

    Original file (AR20120000393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 25 Days ????? The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021332

    Original file (AR20100021332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b (2), AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he failed to go to his appointed place of duty on several occasions, disobeyed a lawful command from a CPT, his superior commissioned officer on (071128), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On...