Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 208/07/23 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "I would like to request an upgrade of my current discharge to a General Discharge. I would like another opportunity to prove my abilities, loyalties and desire to serve my country. Upon entering the service in November of 2005, I was a very immature 17 years old. This was my first time away from family, friends and parental supervision. I made the mistake of befriending some older individuals who persuaded me into the use of illegal drugs. Previous to that time I had never been exposed to drugs due to my home schooling and close family and friends. When terminated in February of 2007, I came back to my family and immediately ceased the use of illegal drugs. I have been drug free ever since. The job I am currently working requires periodic drug testing, and I have never failed. I have realized what a huge, short sighted mistake I made in disrespecting the U.S. Army, my family and myself. Almost two years of maturing and family guidance have helped me regain my self-respect and life direction. Your consideration will be greatly respected and appreciated. Im looking forward to resolving past issues and becoming a productive asset to the United States Army."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 070213 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Btry, 2-11 FAR, Schofield Barracks, HI
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 17
Current ENL Date: 051116 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 18 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 28Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 28Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 13B10 Cannon Crewmember GT: 95 EDU: GED Cert Overseas: Hawaii Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Rocklin, CA
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 31 January 2007, the applicant was charged with failure to report (061225); wrongfully used marijuana x 2 between (061103-061203) and (061225); wrongfully used ecstasy between (061231-070105); and did wrongfully possess fifty (50) pills of ecstasy with intent to distribute (061231). On 31 January 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate and senior intermediate commanders recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5 February 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.
The applicant's record contains two CID Reports of Investigation dated 23 January 2007 and 12 January 2007.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he and submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper. The analyst noted that the Government introduced into the discharge packet the results of a biochemical test that was part of the applicants Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) treatment plan. This is limited use information as defined in Chapter 6, AR 600-85. Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable characterization of service. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable. This action entails a restoration of grade to PV2/E-2.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 6 May 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the Government introduced into the discharge packet the results of a biochemical test that was part of the applicants Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) treatment plan. This is limited use information as defined in Chapter 6, AR 600-85. Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it. This action entails a restoration of grade to PV2/E-2.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 5 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: PV2/E2
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080011605
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014678
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. However, the board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012296
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012363aC071121
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs/wrongfully used marijuana on two occasions), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012363
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs/wrongfully used marijuana on two occasions), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 May 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010727
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 May 2009, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) declared the applicant an alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure. On 22 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure/ASAP failure (090518), with a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010622
Applicant Name: ????? Suffered more for the actions of that sargeant then I should have. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080010622 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006406
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine x 4 on (051109), (051212), (060120), (060131); disobeyed a lawful order from a CPT and communicated a threat to a CPT, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001436
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority reviewed the discharge action and directed that the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010329
On 16 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001203
On 30 May 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily tendered her resignation from the service under the requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 3, AR 600-8-24, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by a general court-martial or a board of officers. On 25 June 2007, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...