Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018112
Original file (AR20080018112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 081107	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant in which he states, "Need upgrade for education benefits (GI Bill) that I applied for upon entry into military.".

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 040517   Chapter: 14-12c(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHC, 75th Inf, US Infantry Center, Ft. Benning, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  34
Current ENL Date: 020214    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 03 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 03 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91W  Medical Spec   GT: 91   EDU: College Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: GWOTSM, NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Loveland, OH
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the Applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The facts and circumstances pertaining to the Applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the Applicant.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct- drug abuse).  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
             After a careful review of the Applicant’s available military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the Applicant’s discharge.  The Applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the Applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the Applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct - drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the Applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The analyst noted the Applicant's issue, however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the Applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
               Notwithstanding the propriety of the Applicant's discharge, the analyst determined that the Applicant was incorrectly assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “3”.  Therefore, the analyst recommends that the reentry eligibility code be administratively changed to RE-4. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 19 August 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  The Board directed an administrative correction be made to the Applicant's DD Form 214, block 27 to read 'RE 4'.












        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080018112
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007087

    Original file (AR20060007087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-abuse...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007006

    Original file (AR20080007006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008841

    Original file (AR20080008841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002301

    Original file (AR20080002301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013729

    Original file (AR20090013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, drug abuse, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the Applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013349

    Original file (AR20080013349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/20 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board directs ARBA St. Louis to administratively change block 25, "Separation Authority" to "Paragraph 14-12c, block 26, "Separation Code (SPD)" to "JKQ" and block 27, "Reentry Eligibility (RE)...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006970

    Original file (AR20090006970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse),...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021846

    Original file (AR20110021846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of marijuana between (100111 and 100125), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002084

    Original file (AR20080002084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c( 2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c (2) by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004268

    Original file (AR20080004268 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Except for the foregoing modifications to the applicant's separation authority, separation code, and reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst found that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...