Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 08/10/20 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 070627
Discharge Received: Date: 080104 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HQ, 1st Inf Div, Ft. Riley, KS
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070606, Wrongful use of cocaine (070225-070228); Forfeiture of $2352.00 pay per month for two months, one month suspended; restriction for 60 days, suspended, and written GOMR reprimand (GO).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 48
Current ENL Date: 051103 Current ENL Term: 06 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 02 Days ?????
Total Service: 28 Yrs, 00 Mos, 10 Days (Computation based on best available records)
Previous Discharges: RA - 790625-820405/HD
RA - 820406-850107/HD
RA - 850108-900524/HD
RA - 900525-920801/HD
USAR IRR - 920802-951127/NA
ARNG - 951128-960801/HD
USAR - 960802-990502/NA
OAD - 990502-000108/HD
USAR - 000109-030802/NA
OAD - 030803-030926/HD
USAR - 030927-031016/NA
OAD - 031017-051102/HD
Highest Grade: E8 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 74B Info Sys Opr-Analyst GT: 114 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Hawaii, Republic of Korea, Kuwait Combat: Hungary, Bosnia
Decorations/Awards: MSM, ARCOM (2), AAM, AGCM (3), NDSM (2), AFEM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, NCOPDR (3), ASR, OSR (2), AFRM w/ M device (2), NATO Medal
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: West Memphis, AR
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the Applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 27 June 2007, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct wrongful use of cocaine (070225-070228), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Applicant was advised of her rights. On 28 June 2007, the Applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board. On 23 July 2007, the Applicant was notified to appear before an administrative separation board and advised of her rights. On 17 August 2007, the administrative separation board convened. The Applicant appeared with counsel. The board recommended that the Applicant be discharged with issuance of a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 30 August 2007, the Applicant submitted a rebuttal memorandum to the board findings requesting a new board and alleging that the board lacked jurisdiction. On 12 September 2007 the separation authority denied the request and approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and recommended that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 28 December 2007, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), approved the separation and directed that the Applicant would be discharged with a characterization of service under other than honorable conditions, and be issued a Separation Program Designator Code of JKK - Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and a Reentry Eligibility Code of 4. The Applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade of Private E-1.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of the Applicants available military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit a partial upgrade of the Applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The analyst does not condone the Applicants misconduct; however, the evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. The analyst found that the length and quality of the Applicant's service mitigated the discrediting entries in her service record. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the Applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. However, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable. This action entails restoration of grade to E-8/MSG.
Notwithstanding the propriety of the Applicant's discharge, the analyst determined that the Applicant was incorrectly assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. Therefore, the analyst recommends that the reentry eligibility code be administratively changed to RE-4. Except for the foregoing modification to the Applicant's reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst found that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 7 August 2009 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the Applicants length and quality of her service to include her service in a hostile environment and, as a result, it is inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. This action entails restoration of grade to E-8/MSG. The Board directed an administrative correction be made to the Applicant's reentry eligibility code to RE '4'.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 4 No change 1
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: Change RE Code to RE4
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: Restoration of grade to E-8/MSG.
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080016470
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013182
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-5, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for being convicted by a civil court of aggravated assault with bodily injury with a deadly weapon (060629), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 January 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009853
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, also committed a number of offenses which constituted a pattern of misconduct, wrongfully disobeyed orders from noncommissioned officers, on more than one occasion wrongfully consumed alcohol...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007184
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I would like to upgrade my General Under Honorable Discharge to an Honorable Discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 3."
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000290
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003330
Applicant Name: ????? The Board recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was separated from the Army with an under other than honorable conditions discharge which was later upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions by the Army Discharge Review Board based on the length and quality of his service to include his combat service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011209
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was informed of his right to consult with legal counsel and on 1 March 2007, according to his election of rights document in his official military personnel record (OMPF) regarding his separation under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011011
Application Receipt Date: 2009/06/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge from the United States Army Reserve are not contained in the available records. However, the issue that the applicant submitted is not a matter on which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in discharge because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion relating to the discharge process nor is it associated with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026755
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018708
Applicant Name: ????? Despite these issues, I served to the best of my ability. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012959
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 March 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...