Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015098
Original file (AR20080015098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/09/25	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that "she is requesting a change in her discharge status because of the reason she was discharged."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 001010
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 001101   Chapter: 11       AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct	   RE:     SPD: JGA   Unit/Location: Company E, 71st Transportation, 8th Transportation Brigade, Fort Eustis, VA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 000608    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 4 Mos, 24 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 8 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 990217-990524/NA
                                       IADT   990525-990814/NA
                                       USAR 990815-000607/HD
                                           (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88N00 Traffic Mgmt Coordinator   GT: 109   EDU: HS Ltr   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 10 October 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11-3a (3) (b), AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct; in that she demonstrated an inability to pass the APFT tests; as indicated in the counseling statements on: (000614); (000803); (000811); (000816); (000822); (000829); and that she will not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and become a satisfactory Soldier, with an uncharacterized discharge.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status.  This provision of the regulation applies to Soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service.  The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS).  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 2 July 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA 

















VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080015098
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018480

    Original file (AR20080018480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002706

    Original file (AR20080002706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017264

    Original file (AR20070017264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life and failure to complete the APFT requirements with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier’s service will be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003592

    Original file (AR20080003592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, and for not having the ability or physical endurance needed to complete Basic training, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002569

    Original file (AR20080002569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Board Vote:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016528

    Original file (AR20070016528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment, repeated APFT failure, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010080

    Original file (AR20060010080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (failure to adapt), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006312

    Original file (AR20090006312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to the military motivationally with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014592

    Original file (AR20080014592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and issues she submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013569

    Original file (AR20070013569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to meet the minimum Army’s Physical Fitness Standards (APFT) required to complete basic training due to lack of motivation and low aptitude, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 21 March 2001, the separation authority waived...