Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015055
Original file (AR20080015055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 080924	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: 070919     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant.  The Applicant indicates he was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions and assigned an RE Code 4.  Further, the Applicant indicates he was "arrested for getting smart with my Lt.Col. when he asked me had I ever been arrested" and that he wants one more chance to serve his country.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050930   Chapter: NIF      AR: 635-200
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NIF   Unit/Location: D Co, 2nd Bn, 39th Inf, Ft Jackson, SC 

Time Lost: NIF

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 050825    Current ENL Term: 8 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 00 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 01 Mos, 05 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR-050825-050930/NA  (concurrent service)
Highest Grade: E1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: NIF   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: NIF   Combat: NIF
Decorations/Awards: NIF

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Philadelphia, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: The Applicant states he is trying to finish paramedic school with an associates degree in appliced science and, that he is a member of "a group of men & children who get together so the men can show the children how to grow up and live life as men." 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the Applicant's record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 30 September 2005, Department of the Army, Headquarters, United States Army Training Center and Fort Jackson, South Carolina, Orders # 273-1300, discharged the Applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 30 September 2005.  The order identifies the Army Regulation governing the separation of enlisted members from the United States Army Reserve and, without evidence otherwise, the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
       
       The Applicant indicates on the DD Form 293 he submitted with his application that he received a discharge under other than honorable conditions, however, the Applicant's record is void of any information concerning the character of the discharge he received.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the Applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted with the application as to the propriety of the discharge, the analyst determined that the Applicant’s available record of service during the period under review is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  However, the Applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted Order which was authenticated by the appropriate military authority and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the Applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The Applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the Applicant’s service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.?????

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 25 June 2009         Location: Chicago, IL

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: Character Reference (1 page).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
         After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the circumstances surrounding the Applicant's misconduct (entry level status) and his post service accomplishments (community work and academic achievements) and, as a result, it is inequitable.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to uncharacterized and change the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code to RE-3.  The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.  














        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: Change RE Code										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080015055
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002285

    Original file (AR20070002285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. This document identifies the Army Regulation governing the separation of enlisted members from the United States Army Reserve and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 24 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002285aC071031

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. This document identifies the Army Regulation governing the separation of enlisted members from the United States Army Reserve and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s available record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005514

    Original file (AR20090005514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 5 December 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000311

    Original file (AR20090000311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. However, the Applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted Orders 08-080-00040, DA HQ, 412th Engineer Command, Vicksburg, MS, dated 20 March 2008, which discharged the Applicant from the Army Reserve effective 20 March 2008, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the Applicant's issue, however, the analyst determined that the Applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013583

    Original file (AR20070013583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. It indicates that the applicant was discharged by reason of unsatisfactory participant, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009855

    Original file (AR20080009855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 071126 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: A Co, 120th AG Bn, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was discharge from the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015250

    Original file (AR20080015250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013922

    Original file (AR20070013922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant's NGB Form 22 indicates he was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26e(2b), NGR 600-200, by reason of first-time drug offenders, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Certification Signature and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008579

    Original file (AR20070008579.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct- drug abuse).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004668

    Original file (AR20090004668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 149 and supporting documents submitted by the applicant. It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 13-1, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Reentry Codes (RE) are provided to active duty members on military discharge documents (DD Form 214, Record of Discharge) and determine...