Applicant Name:
Application Receipt Date: 080924 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980612
Discharge Received: Date: 980724 Chapter: 13 AR: 635-200
Reason: Unsatisfactory Performance RE: SPD: JHJ Unit/Location: D Co, 2nd Bn, 325th Abn Inf Regt, Fort Bragg, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 980304, at Fort Bragg, NC, on or about, 22 February 1998, the applicant was disrespectful in language toward a non-commissioned officer; who was at the time in the performance of his duty; reduction to the grade of E-2, forfeiture of $242.00 pay per month for one month, extra duty for 14 days, restriction to the battalion area, place of duty, place of worship, dining facility, dental facility and medical facility for 14 days. (CG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 970715 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 00Mos, 10Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 00Mos, 10Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11H1P Heavy Anti-Armor Weapon Infantry GT: 96 EDU: HS GRAD Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, PRCHT
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 29 May 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for receiving numerous negative counseling statements for discipline, failing to report for duty and military performance; the applicant also received a company grade Article 15, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with a general under honorable discharge. On 12 June 1998 separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was not transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13 contains the policy and outlines the procedures for separating individuals for unsatisfactory performance, and provides, in pertinent part, that commanders will separate a member under this chapter when, in the commander's judgment, the member will not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier. Army policy states that a general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a fully honorable discharge may be granted in meritorious cases.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the incidents of unsatisfactory performance. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of the service was not consistent with the Armys standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 21 July 2009 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080015018
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009263
The evidence of record shows that on 21 April 2004, Orders 04-112-0004, DA, HQ, United States Army, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command (A), Fort Bragg, North Carolina, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 21 April 2004, with an general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003179
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015161
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable condition discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001878
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving an Article 15 for AWOL (001127-001219); counseled for disrespect towards NCOs; stealing phone services; missing equipment; taking unauthorized passes and unsatisfactory PT performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001437
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029326
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006442
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016867
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Physical Standards" with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005130
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 March 2007, the unit commander (LTC (P) CA, USAR) notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, paragraph 13-1a AR 135-138, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for non-participant mission muster orders, in that he failed to report on (061014), (061015), (061111), (061112), and (070114), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015108
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...