Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014612
Original file (AR20080014612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/18	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosedd DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 070820
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070823   Chapter: 6-3a       AR: 635-200
Reason: Hardship	   RE:     SPD: KDB   Unit/Location: T Co, 266th QM Bn, Fort Lee, VA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None 

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  25
Current ENL Date: 070521    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  20 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 03Mos, 03Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 06Mos, 06Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA-060206-060508/UNC
Highest Grade: E1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None    GT: 96   EDU: GED   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Fairmont, WV
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       Evidence of record shows that on 20 August 2007, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 6, AR 635-200, by reason of hardship/dependency of family member.  The unit commander recommended approval of the applicant's request for discharge.  On 22 August 2007, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with a honorable discharge.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of uncharacterized.
       
       
       
       
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 6-3a provides for the separation of Soldiers because of genuine dependency.  Genuine dependency, for the purpose of separation under this paragraph, is defined as when death or disability of a member of a Soldier's (or spouse's) immediate family causes that member to rely upon the Soldier for principal care or support.  The regulation requires an uncharacterized separation of service when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue she submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS).  The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge by reason of hardship/dependency of a family member, with the description of service as uncharacterized.  Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  The analyst noted  the applicant's issue, however, a honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.  A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  Furthermore, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 22 May 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.












        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080014612
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013729

    Original file (AR20080013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge by reason of hardship/dependency of a family member, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000275

    Original file (AR20080000275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 shows a characterization of service as uncharacterized, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason of Harship, separation code of KDB and a reentry code (RE) of "3". The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant's record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009819

    Original file (AR20060009819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 08 Days Item 12c on the DD Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read, 00 yrs, 06 mos, 08 days. On 2 January 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 29 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012315

    Original file (AR20100012315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 6, paragraph 6-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of hardship with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011074

    Original file (AR20100011074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 October 2009, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 6, paragraph 6-3a, AR 635-200, by reason of hardship/dependency of family member. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge by reason of hardship/dependency of a family member, with the description of service as general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001599

    Original file (AR20080001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the intermediate commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(2) for Sole Parent, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002300

    Original file (AR20080002300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant. The analyst found that the applicant's record shows a properly amended DD Form 215 correcting the characterization of service as Honorable, with the separation authority AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3A, narrative reason as Hardship, separation code as KDB.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003264

    Original file (AR20090003264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 December 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for academically failing the 91B10 course and refusing to accept the 57E10 MOS offer due to low test scores, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014720

    Original file (AR20080014720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 September 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level status performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life and for being unmotivated and unwilling to adjust to authority and the rigors of basic training, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | AR2003095919

    Original file (AR2003095919.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 6, AR 635-200 by reason of hardship, with an uncharacterized discharge. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....