Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014603
Original file (AR20080014603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/09/15	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 050627
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050726   Chapter: 14-12c(2)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHC, 2-27 IN Bn, Schofield Bks, HI 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050623, wrongful use of marijuana (041219-050118), wrongful use of methamphetamines (050112-050118), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $617 x 2, 45 days extra duty and restriction (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 030326    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, ??Mos, 04Days 01
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 04Mos, 01Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 25U10/Signal Spt Sys Spc   GT: 102   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Hawaii, SWA   Combat: Afghanistan (040926-050925)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ACM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Orlando, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 27 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana (041219-050118), and for wrongful use of methamphetamines (050112-050118), with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 27 June 2005, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  On 30 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a soldier.  The applicant, as a soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  Further, the analyst noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.  The Applicant states that he had some medical issues, however, the record does not support the applicant’s contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  Additionally, if he had personal problems as he states, caused by a death in the family, the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 19 June 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  










        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080014603
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009008

    Original file (AR20120009008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of marijuana between (050424 and 050524) and for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for the wrongful use of marijuana (050504), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011253

    Original file (AR20080011253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge in that the Administrative Separation Board and chain of command recommended suspending the discharge. On 7 September 2005, the separation authority approved the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004739

    Original file (AR20120004739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017777

    Original file (AR20090017777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015156

    Original file (AR20070015156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge On 12 November 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016417

    Original file (AR20070016417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of cocaine (020206-020219), wrongful use of amphetamines and d-methamphetamine (030101-030103) and wrongful use of marijuana X 2 (020121-020219 and 021204-030103), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012667

    Original file (AR20080012667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016046

    Original file (AR20060016046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongful use of marijuana (040915-041014), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013565

    Original file (AR20070013565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for being AWOL, for wrongful use of marijuana x 2, for wrongful use of methamphetamines x 3, for wrongful use of amphetamines x 2, and for wrongful use of cocaine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000495

    Original file (AR20100000495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (050108-050118), was found in wrongful possession of marijuana on (070507) and disobeyed a lawful general regulation by wrongfully possessing a marijuana pipe, with a general, under honorable...