Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012924
Original file (AR20080012924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/14	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 070717
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070720   Chapter: 8-35d(3)    AR: NGR 600-200
Reason: Defective Enlistment or Reenlistment	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: Co C, 2-112th IN, Bellefonte, PA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 050812    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 11Mos, 09Days ?????
Total Service:  		01 Yrs, 11Mos, 09Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  State College, PA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       All the specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army National Guard are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a memorandum dated 17 July 2007, that indicates  that the applicant was temporary disqualified on a new MEPS physical examination and couldn’t be shipped to AIT within the allotted time period due to an open profile on his shoulder and back pain he incurred at his civilian job.  The evidence indicates that Orders 201-1001, Department of Military Affairs, ARNG, State of Pennsylvania, Annville, PA, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard, effective 20 July 2007, with an uncharacterized separation of service.  The record contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service).  It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-35d(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of defective enlistment or reenlistment, with service uncharacterized and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       NGR Regulation 600-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-35d(3), of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that an unfulfilled enlistment commitment exists when the Soldier receives a written enlistment commitment for which the Soldier is qualified but which cannot be fulfilled by the Army National Guard through no fault of the Soldier.  Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required.  For ARNGUS and USAR soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  For soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, It terminates 180 days after beginning training.  For soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option, it terminates 90 days after beginning Phase II advanced individual training (AIT).  Soldiers completing Phase I BT or basic combat training (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant had a medical disqualification that precluded him from completing his scheduled training within the allotted time period and was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-35d(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of defective enlistment or reenlistment.  The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because he was in entry-level status.  For ARNGUS and USAR soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  For soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, It terminates 180 days after beginning training.  For soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option, it terminates 90 days after beginning Phase II advanced individual training (AIT).  Soldiers completing Phase I BT or basic combat training (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II.  Furthermore, for Soldiers in entry-level status, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief.  ?????

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 22 May 2009         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  










        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080012924
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019449

    Original file (AR20080019449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-35d(4), NGR 600-200, by reason of failure to report to IET Phase 1 or 2 within 24 months, with a characterization of service of uncharacterized, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." However, in review of the applicant’s available service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005099

    Original file (AR20080005099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I am now applying to be a police officer in the state of oklahoma and they will not take me because of my uncharacterized discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012442

    Original file (AR20080012442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? An application for that Board is enclosed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20080012442 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 3 pages

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018433

    Original file (AR20070018433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040901 Discharge Received: Date: 041207 Chapter: 8-26g(3) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Defective Enlistment Agreement RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: TRP C 1-18th CAV, Ontario, CA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016068

    Original file (AR20070016068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26b(3), NGR 600-200, by reason of failure to meet medical procurement standards, with service uncharacterized. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018948

    Original file (AR20070018948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 071030 Chapter: 8-35L (8) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Medically Unfit for Retention Per AR 40-501 RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 623rd Pers Det, Springfield, IL Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006792

    Original file (AR20060006792.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: Thru: Chief, National Guard Bureau Date: 28 March 2007 To: Adjutant General, State of Illinois The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004353

    Original file (AR20130004353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the 2 years he served as an enlisted member of the Army National Guard (ARNG), he had an extraordinary service record. It was determined that as a split option Soldier, who did not complete all the required training to become MOS qualified, he was considered in an entry level status. The regulation stipulates that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated if, the Soldier is on a split option and has not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015245

    Original file (AR20090015245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015754

    Original file (AR20080015754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers completing Phase I BT or basic combat training (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.