Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/07/02 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The Applicant states, "When I first did my time in the Service I was young and stupid and made some bad choices while I was in I did good things just made mistakes now Im better And I have a family and I would like a second chance".
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050823
Discharge Received: Date: 051004 Chapter: 14-12C(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct, Abuse of Illegal Drugs RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: C Co, 2d BN, 505th PIR, 82nd Airborne Div, Ft Bragg, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050719/ on or about (050703) wrongfully consuming alcohol while under the age of twenty-one; through neglect broke the glass case containing the fire extinguisher; and on or about (050703) unlawfully struck PV2 on the face with a fist; reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $671 pay per month for two months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG).
040916, on or about (040730-040830) wrongfully use marijuana, a Schedule I controlled substance; reduction to E1, forfeiture of $596 pay per month for two months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 040401 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 16 weeks
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 06Mos, 04Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 06Mos, 04Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B/Infantryman GT: 102 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, GWOTSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Merritt Island, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12C(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductin that you wrongfully used marijuana, consumed alcohol while under the age of 21 on multiple occasions, assaulted another paratrooper and destruction of military property, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
There is a CID Report dated 041028 in the record.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of the entire applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of the former soldiers service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 6 May 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080011504
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006969
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, by reason of patterns of misconduct for receiving a field grade article 15 for drinking alcohol while underage (060223), receiving a company grade article 15 for dereliction of duty and disobeying a noncommissioned officer (061030), and violating curfew (070327), with a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012846
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for offenses punishable under the UCMJ on (021112, 031015, and 040610), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008183
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Certification Signature...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014821
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, the analyst noted that the unit commander used Board Procedures when notifying the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008902
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 06Mos, 04Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 May 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (receiving a Article 15 on 6 November 2001 for wrongful use of a controlled substance, and for receiving various DA Form 4856's (Counseling Statements) for FTR, DUI, and disobeying orders), with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019400
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007560
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018594
The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008871
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (absent without leave 7 to 13 January 2004, disobeying superior commission officer and noncommissioned officer on 5 January 2004, failure to report for accountability formation on 1 October 2003, failure to report for work call on 2 October...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009948
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.