Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/07/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050427
Discharge Received: Date: 050512 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: HHT, 3rd ACR (Rear), Fort Carson, CO
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050303, failure to report x 3 (050130), (050207), (050207), and dereliction of duty in that he failed to wear his seatbelt (050215), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $288 x 1, extra duty for 14 days and restriction for 14 days (FG).
041210, violated regiment's pass policy and lied to a NCO (041130), 14 days extra duty and 14 days restriction (Summarized).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 22
Current ENL Date: 040617 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 18 weeks/with an approved moral waiver (040503)
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 10Mos, 26Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 10Mos, 26Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 19D10 Cavalry Scout GT: 96 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Chicago, IL
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for DWI x 2 (050224), (041218), drunk on duty (050224), failed to comply with company's pass policy and lied to a NCO (041124), received a Troop Article 15 for failure to report x 3 and dereliction of duty (050303), and failure to report x 2 (050331) and (050404), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 May 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Furthermore, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 24 April 2009 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080011250
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015742
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 April 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006750
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that she received a Summarized Article 15 for Violation of Article 86 (050124), a Company Grade Article 15 for violation of Article 86 with suspended punishment on (050224) and on (050314), the suspension of the punishment:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007059
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014937
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of marijuana, with a general discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016088
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011715
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009447
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found a mitigating factor that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to general, under honorable conductions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004071
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Appendix A Para 1-26(k)/Paragraph 8-26(k), NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of " 3." The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26(k), NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013508
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I am writing this letter in regard to the Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009280
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.