Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2008/07/02 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not In File (NIF)
Discharge Received: Date: 940706 Chapter: 8-26q AR: NGR 600-200
Reason: Acts or Pattern of Misconduct - Abuse of Illegal Drugs RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: B Co, 949th Support Bn, Fort Worth, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 41
Current ENL Date: 920804 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 11Mos, 03Days ?????
Total Service: 20 Yrs, 08Mos, 21Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USMC 720223-760223/HD
RA 780926-820925/HD
USAR 850714-890217/NA
USAR 890218-910713/HD
Highest Grade: E-6 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 55B/Ammunition Spc GT: 97 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Vietnam Combat: Vietnam (721028-730215)
Decorations/Awards: AGCM, NDSM, VSM-1BSS, VCGUC, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Fort Worth, TX
Post Service Accomplishments: Has completed a 9-month residential treatment program at the VA Health Care System, now at 7 years of sobriety, enrolled in community college.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence shows the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army National Guard of the State Texas. The evidence indicates that on 7 July 1994, HQ, Military Department, State of Texas, Office of the Adjutant General, Austin, Texas, Orders 128-225, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army, effective date 6 July 1994, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct illegal use of drugs, with a characterization of service of under other than other conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3."
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Paragraph 8-26q (3) of that regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted with his application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the State of Texas Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army. However, the record does contain a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), which indicates that the applicant was unavailable for signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the service and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or pattern of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The analyst noted the applicants accomplishments in reference to his successful completion of the rehabilitation program and his seven years of sobriety; however, the evidence was not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review. Furthermore, if the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Boards consideration. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 24 April 2009 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 2 No change 3
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20080010978
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016060
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 930630 Chapter: 8-26g AR: NGB 600-200 Reason: Acts of Patterns of Misconduct - Illegal use of drugs RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: Detachment 1, Co B, 372d Support Bn, Temple TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011672
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: Thru: Chief, National Guard Bureau Date: 29 August...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011659
This document indicates that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard of the state of New Jersey and as a Reserve of the Army under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a charactaerization of service of under other than honorable conditions, with a RE code of "3". The evidence of record shows on the applicant's DD Form 214 that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018071
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-78 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006333
Applicant Name: ????? However, the record does contain the administrative separation board proceedings that recommend the applicant for separation from the North Carolina Army National Guard. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-78 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008935
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010453
Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 11...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006164
Current ENL Service: 06 Yrs, 06Mos, 03Days ????? The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006164aC071121
This document indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3". c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012026
This document indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under...