Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008810
Original file (AR20080008810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/06/02	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070427   Chapter: 5-8      AR: 635-200
Reason: Parenthood	   RE:     SPD: JDG   Unit/Location: HQ, 96st CS SPT ASB, Fort Campbell, KY 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None, however, the applicant does make reference to having received a Field Grade Article 15 while in the Army in the issues section of her DD Form 293.

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 041026    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 06Mos, 02Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 06Mos, 02Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 27D10/Paralegal Specialist   GT: 89   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (060520-060905)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Clarksville, TN
Post Service Accomplishments: Records show that the applicant enlisted in the Tennessee Army National Guard (080821) for a period of 6 (six) years.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The appicant's record is viod of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a  discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JDG (i.e., parenthood) , with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."  Evidence of record further shows that on 12 April 2007, Orders 102-0602, DA HQ, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date: 27 April 2007.
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-8 provides that a Soldier may be separated when parental obligations interfere with fullfillment of military responsibilities.  Specific reasons for separation because of parenthood include inability to perform prescribed duties satisfactorily, repeated absenteeism, late for work, inability to participate in field training exercises or perform special duties such as CQ and Staff Duty NCO, and nonavailability for world assignment or deployment according to the needs of the Army.  Unless reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a soldier being separated for the convenience of the government will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry level status. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process.  That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issues, however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.  Additionally, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain the specific documents that would indicate the reason for her separation from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action for the Board’s consideration.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 20 March 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.




        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080008810
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008417

    Original file (AR20080008417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Parenthood" and the separation code is "JDG." An application for that Board is enclosed.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006794

    Original file (AR20080006794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 2008, the separation authority determined that the applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents she submitted as to the propriety of her discharge, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit any change in the applicant's reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014943

    Original file (AR20060014943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 27 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008015

    Original file (AR20080008015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in her own behalf. No soldier will be awarded a characterization of service under honorable conditions under this chapter unless the soldier is notified of the specific factors in her service record that warrant such a characterization, using the notification procedure. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015014

    Original file (AR20080015014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007818

    Original file (AR20080007818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I found myself in a situation where I could either stay and confront a number of civilians with the chance of grievous injury to them and/or myself, or I could remove myself from the situation and avoid confrontation entirely, but in the process of leaving the scene encountered an overzealous local officer who wouldn’t settle for me explaining the situation and passing a field sobriety test, which was proven in court. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010411

    Original file (AR20070010411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service, a Separation Code of JDG (i.e., parenthood), and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." The narrative reason specified by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004813

    Original file (AR20080004813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 November 2007 the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to maintain an adequate family care plan with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000451

    Original file (AR20090000451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, for failure to maintain an adequate family care plan and failing a urinalysis on or about 29 August 2007 for methamphetamines, with an general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008231

    Original file (AR20060008231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 03Mos, 26Days ????? Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 4 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...