Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008550
Original file (AR20080008550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/05/08	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 149 and attached document submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 000928   Chapter: 14-12B       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 86th Cbt Spt Hospital, Ft Campbell, KY 

Time Lost: 22 days confinement resulting from Summary Court Martial (000614-000706) 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): Summary Court Martial for use of cocaine as found in Company Commander's 25 AUG 00 Memorandum to Commander, 86th CSH, Ft Campbell, KY.

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  37
Current ENL Date: 970925    Current ENL Term: NIF Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 11 Mos, 11 Days ?????
Total Service:  		06 Yrs, 04 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 800826-830823/HD
                                       RA 911001-920225/HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91M/Hospital Food Service Specialist   GT: 88   EDU: HS   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  South Ozone Park, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: None Provided

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., misconduct).
       
       
       

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor, and is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier’s service is so meritorious that any other characterization would be inappropriate.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the former soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.  Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: February 27, 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: None

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  









        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080008550
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003091

    Original file (AR20090003091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019245

    Original file (AR20080019245.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph, Chapter 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Pattern of Misconduct", and the separation code is "JKA." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010123

    Original file (AR20120010123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that she was arrested on or about 13 March 2010, for driving under the influence of alcohol and due to the arrest, it was found out that she broke the No Contact Order between her and another PV2. The analyst...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011241

    Original file (AR20080011241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 26 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Having examined the above documentation, the analyst determined that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010602

    Original file (AR20090010602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011073

    Original file (AR20070011073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On date not on memorandum, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character -...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012271

    Original file (AR20080012271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 3 April 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009445

    Original file (AR20090009445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 June 2002 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000684

    Original file (AR20080000684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 13 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006966

    Original file (AR20090006966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable and the reason for discharge be changed to Secretarial...