Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008099
Original file (AR20080008099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/05/20	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 149 submitted by the applicant

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 060608
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060724   Chapter: 5-13       AR: 635-200
Reason: Personality Disorder	   RE:     SPD: JFX   Unit/Location: HHC, 1st BN, 1st AVA Reg, 21st Cav BDE, Ft Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 050421    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 03Mos, 04Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 03Mos, 04Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 89B10 Ammunition Spec   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 18 May 2006, the applicant was diagnosed with an occupational problem and personality disorder.  On 8 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, and as suffering from a long standing disorder of character and behavior, which is of such severity as to interfere with her being able to adequately serve in the U.S. Army.  It was also concluded that efforts to rehabilitate or develop her into a satisfactory member of the military would be unsuccessful or unlikely.  The unit commander recommended an honorable discharge.  She was advised of her rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge.  On 28 June 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier's ability to perform duty.  The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40.  Army policy requires the award of a fully honorable discharge in such case.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
        After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review and the issue she submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.  The analyst noted that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder with a honorable discharge.  However, Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13a, states that the diagnosis of personality disorder must have been established by a psychiatrist or doctoral-level clinical psychologist with necessary and appropriate professional credentials who is privileged to conduct mental health evaluations for the DOD components.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable, reason changed to Secretarial Authority and a RE Code to 1.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 20 March 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was and is improper.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant's diagnosis was not established by a psychiatrist or doctoral-level clinical psychologist with necessary and appropriate professional credentials who is privileged to conduct mental health evaluations for the DOD components.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority and the RE Code to 1.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 0
Reason -     Change 5    No change 0
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Provision of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SDP Code of "JFF: (Involuntary Discharge).
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080008099
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015184

    Original file (AR20090015184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012169

    Original file (AR20090012169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. The narrative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006727

    Original file (AR20080006727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, for being diagnosed with a personality disorder of such severity that it impairs his ability to perform his daily military duties. On 14 December 1993, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018179

    Original file (AR20080018179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 20 January 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, which were: post traumtic stress disorder, behavioral problems attitudinal problems render you incapable of successfully coping with the emotional stress of military training, and recommended that he be discharged with an entry level uncharacterized...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011860

    Original file (AR20090011860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, which were: adjustment disorder with depressed and anxious mood, this condition could impair unit readiness and safety, and potentially interfere with his ability to effectively perform his military duties, and recommended that he be discharge with an entry level uncharacterized separation of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012270

    Original file (AR20070012270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 04Days ????? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011791

    Original file (AR20070011791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability with a honorable discharge for being diagnosed as experiencing an adjustment disorder, unspecified and represents a psychiatric condition. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The narrative reason specified by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014941

    Original file (AR20060014941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, due to other designated physical or mental conditions (diagnosed by competent medical authority with a adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of conduct), with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003990

    Original file (AR20090003990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, on 8 October 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel with regard to his legal rights under a Chapter 5-17 discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010975

    Original file (AR20060010975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification...