Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005977
Original file (AR20080005977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2008/04/18	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached document submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080307   Chapter: 7    AR: 635-200
Reason: Defective Enlistment Agreement	   RE:     SPD: KDS   Unit/Location: B Co, 264th Trainee MC, Fort Sam Houston, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 070815    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 06Mos, 23Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 06Mos, 23Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: NIF   EDU: 12 Years   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Kansas City, KS
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 7, Section III, AR 635-200, by reason of defective enlistment agreement, with service uncharacterized.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KDS (i.e., defective enlistment agreement), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "1."  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
             Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7, Section III, of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that an unfulfilled enlistment commitment exists when the Soldier receives a written enlistment commitment for which the Soldier is qualified but which cannot be fulfilled by the Army through no fault of the Soldier.  Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under chapter 3, section II.
       

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 7, Section III, by reason of defective enlistment agreement, with service uncharacterized.  The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status.  A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when separated in entry-level status.  A fully honorable discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions.  A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant issues; however, did not find said issues sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 February 2009         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080005977
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 2 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004612

    Original file (AR20110004612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025933

    Original file (AR20100025933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024108

    Original file (AR20110024108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. The analyst also noted the applicant's issue about his desire to receive veteran's benefits. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022869

    Original file (AR20110022869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received certificates of appreciation for my volunteering for duties, and it is because of this and my 170+ days of excellent service that I request my separation be changed from uncharacterized to honorable." Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022350

    Original file (AR20110022350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I believe very strongly that my military discharge should be upgraded from “Uncharacterized° to “Honorable for the following three reasons. Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015027

    Original file (AR20080015027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under chapter 3, section II. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013204

    Original file (AR20060013204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 4 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental conditions (diagnosed by a psychiatrist with a depressive disorder, not otherwise specified and recurrent occupational problem), with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Board Discussion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110017161

    Original file (AR20110017161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Since I met and even exceeded all of the requirements and standards set by my contract and the OCS SOP I should not receive an uncharacterized discharge, but rather an honorable discharge. Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013529

    Original file (AR20080013529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized separation of service. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the available record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013312

    Original file (AR20130013312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct; specifically for refusing to train since learning he would not be able to obtain a security clearance required for attendance at the Officers Candidate School (OCS). The applicant was separated from the Army on 14 July 2010, with an uncharacterized discharge. It states a separation...