Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003432
Original file (AR20080003432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 080229	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 071121   
Chapter: 14    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)
RE:     SPD: JKK
Unit/Location: 562D ENG CO BDE CB, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: Military confinement for 25 days (071018-071111), which the applicant makes reference to in his letter submitted with his DD Form 293.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None, however, the applicant makes reference to having been court-martialed for disrespect to a LT and failing a drug test for marijuana, he was sentenced to 30 days in jail which he served only 25 days for good behaivior.

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  870611  
Current ENL Date: 061031    Current ENL Term: 06 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11Mos, 27Days ?????
Total Service:  03 Yrs, 02Mos, 03Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA-040825-061030/HD
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 21B10/Combat Engineer   GT: NIF   EDU: College Transcript-NIF (DD Form 1966/3)   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (051210-061210)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM-2, JSCM, AAM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM, ASR, OSR-2
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant.  His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-drug abuse), with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of "4."

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, documents, and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the analyst determined that the applicant’s characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable.  The analyst found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record.  The analyst determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 16 April 2008              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 5    No change 0   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as result it is inequitable..  The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant’s service to include his combat service, and the circumstances surrounding the discharge, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.  















Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 18 April 2008
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20080003432

Applicant Name:         
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007087

    Original file (AR20060007087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-abuse...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012971

    Original file (AR20070012971.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014781

    Original file (AR20060014781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010978

    Original file (AR20060010978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Therefore, it is recommended to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013001

    Original file (AR20070013001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was 18 years old when he joined the Army and was not ready to be a soldier. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009831

    Original file (AR20060009831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06 Mos, 12 Days ????? Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs). Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 20 July 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217C071116

    Original file (AR20070006217C071116.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst finds no facts that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and recommends that relief be denied in this case.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217aC071121

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's DD Form 293 and attached documents. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070008579

    Original file (AR20070008579.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct- drug abuse).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006217C071116

    Original file (AR20070006217C071116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs). c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst finds no facts that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge and recommends that relief be denied in this case. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was...