Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013575
Original file (AR20070013575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Case Number AR20070013575

Application Receipt Date: 071003	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:  NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 040206   
Chapter: 14    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct
RE:     SPD: JKK
Unit/Location: HQ, 118th Military Police BN, RIARNG, Warwick, RI 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  610508  
Ordered to AD Date: 030207    Current ENL Term: 1 Years  
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 00Mos, 00Days 
Total Service:  18 Yrs, 04Mos, 03Days 
Previous Discharges: USAR 810929-820313/HD
                                      USAR 820314-870828/HD
                                      USAR 900925-920923/UNK
                                      ARNG 920923-000105/GD
	                           ARNG 000106-011026/UNK
                                         
Highest Grade: E-4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 56M Chaplain Assistance   GT: 96   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq/Kuwait  030328-030731
Decorations/Awards: ARCAM, NDSR,AFRM w/M device, NPDR, ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 

Post Service Accomplishments: None

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 31 December 2003, Orders 365-1012, DA, HQ, 10th Mountain Division (Light Infantry) and Fort Drum, Fort Drum New York, released the applicant from the active duty, effective date: 6 February 2004.  The record contains a properly constituted DD form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DD form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).  Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of honorable conditions; however the DD Form 215 changes the characterization of service to general under honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct).  Applicant's NGB for 22 reflects general under honorable conditions discharge for the timeframe in question.  The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records.  

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the independent evidence she submitted, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during the period of enlistment under review is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to her discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DD Form 215 (Correction of DD Form 214), .  These document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  That DD Form 214 along with the DD Form 215 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Furthermore, the file was void of any evidence of PTSD or injuries sustained by the applicant while in Iraq and the applicant did not provide any corroborating evidence of the aforementioned medical issues. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 19 December 2007              
Location: Washington DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 

Case report reviewed and verified by: Gloria Blake, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: ?????
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: ?????

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 




CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 19 December 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



         
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011550

    Original file (AR20080011550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant’s available service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011281

    Original file (AR20080011281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006420

    Original file (AR20090006420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct (Drug Abuse)).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016066

    Original file (AR20080016066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 July 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for wrongful use of marijuana on or about 070228-070329, with an honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016459

    Original file (AR20080016459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 June 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: NA VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the Applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015652

    Original file (AR20100015652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 September 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of a conviction by a civilian court on (950627) for trafficking illegal drugs, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110010869

    Original file (AR20110010869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I served my country honorably during three combat deployments in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020465

    Original file (AR20090020465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I wish that I had never made the choice to wrongfully use illegal drugs. Based on the available record and the statement the applicant submitted the analyst determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief (i.e., Chaplain, Army Community Services, Army Substance Abuse Program), without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003419

    Original file (AR20080003419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 15 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana between on or about (070107-070207), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 May 2007, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002744

    Original file (AR20080002744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for wrongful use of cocaine (061212-061215), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 25 January 2007, the separation authority waived...