Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 070926
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the Applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 061012
Chapter: 14-12C AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)
RE: SPD: JKQ
Unit/Location: 1st Bn BCT, Ft Meade, MD
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060409, Conspiracy to apply for, signing of an official application with false pretense, and receipt of a false military dependent identification (ID) card (050630), signing a sworn statement denying knowledge of and participation in obtaining a false military dependent ID card (051206), making a false statement to a commissioned officer denying participation in the attempt to obtain a false military dependent ID card (051220), having sexual relations with a married woman x 2 (050731 and 060901), cohabitating and having sexual relations with a married woman (060113-060215), forfeiture of $1866.00 pay per month for 2 months, extra duty for 30 days, oral reprimand (FG).
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Year/Month: 63/06
HOR City, State: Columbia, IN
Current ENL Date: 040727 Current ENL Term: Indefinite Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 07 Yrs, 06 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Total Service: 24 Yrs, 01 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: RA 820908-910922/HD
ARNG 911209-970824/HD
Applicant's available military record is incomplete, however Applicant's DA Form 1506, Statement of Service, HRC, St Louis, states Applicant had a break in service from 910923-911208, was in the ANG Active Duty 911209-970824, was active in the USAR 970825-990313 and, was in the USAR, Active Duty 990314-061012.
Highest Grade: E-7
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 42A Human Resources Specialist GT: 112 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Germany, SWA Combat: Kuwait (030412-040413)
Decorations/Awards: AAM (2), USN/USMC Pres Unit Citation, AGCM (2), NDSM (2), GWOTEM, GWOTSM, NCOPDR (2), ASR, AFRM, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed by Applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor conspiracy to apply for, signing of an official application with false pretense, and receipt of a false military dependent identification (ID) card (050630), signing a sworn statement denying knowledge of and participation in obtaining a false military dependent ID card (051206), making a false statement to a commissioned officer denying participation in the attempt to obtain a false military dependent ID card (051220), having sexual relations with a married woman (050731 and 060901), cohabitating and having sexual relations with a married woman (060113-060215), with an under other than honorable discharge. On 22 May 2006, the Applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board. On 11 June 2006, the Applicant was notified to appear before an administrative separation board and advised of his rights. On 24 July 2006, the administrative separation board convened. The Applicant appeared with counsel. The board recommended that the Applicant be discharged with issuance of a character of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 10 August 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Analyst noted Applicant's DD Form 214, block 27, reentry code is annotated as 'NA'. The appropriate reentry code for Separation Code 'JKQ' is 'RE3'.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the Applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the Applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable conditions. This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct. The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the Applicants characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. While the Applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst noted that the overall length and quality of the Applicant's service, to include his combat service, and the supporting documents provided by the Applicant, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the Applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable conditions. However, the reason for discharge remains both proper and equitable. Further recommend the Board change Applicant's reentry code to 'RE3'.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 27 August 2008
Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change 2 No change 3 - Character
Change 0 No change 5 - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the Applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 27 August 2008
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20070013363
______________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014507
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 03 Mos, 03 Days ????? On 30 June 1997, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SSG/E6 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006406
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine x 4 on (051109), (051212), (060120), (060131); disobeyed a lawful order from a CPT and communicated a threat to a CPT, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01739
He receive a Presidential pardon removing his court-martial conviction and bad conduct discharge (BCD) from his record. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. As such, applicant's request for a Presidential pardon is not possible since such action is not within the purview of this Board's authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). Board Decision The discharge was: Proper...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). On 4 May 2006, the applicant voluntarily...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000335
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect that he received a traumatic brain injury as a result of car accident. The Department of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board reviewed the resignation for the good of the service in lieu of general court-martial tendered by the applicant. On 5 February 2008, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicants request for resignation in lieu of trail by general court-martial and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009283
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductin the he was found guilty of multiple offenses of Sodomy and Sexual Abuse, with an other than honorable conditions discharge. On 6 March 2006 the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012272
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (receiving two field grade Article 15's (sexual harassing two different Soldiers, two counts of providing false official statements, assault, unlawful entry with the intent to commit a criminal offense and adultery), counseled for lack of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009166
The Board recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 July 2011, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012318
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant. Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...