Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070003642
Original file (AR20070003642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 070314	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 971112
Discharge Received:     Date: 971120   
Chapter: 5-11    AR: 635-200
Reason: Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards
RE:     SPD: JFW
Unit/Location: A Company, 2d Battalion, 10th Infantry, Training Regiment, Fort Leonard Wood, MO 65473-8958 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  760518  
Current ENL Date: OAD/970924    Current ENL Term: 17 Weeks  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 27Days ?????
Total Service:  00 Yrs, 03Mos, 06Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ARNG-970815-970923/NA
Highest Grade: E1
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 97   EDU: GED   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 5 November 1997, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service.  On 6 November 1997, medical approving authority approved the findings of the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB).  The applicant was informed of the Physical Evaluation Board findings.  On 12 November 1997, the applicant concurred with the medical proceedings, and requested to be discharged from the US Army.  On 12 November 1997, the unit commander recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Army.  On 14 November 1997, the separation approving authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of uncharacterized.  On 18 November 1997, Orders 322-0360, DA HQ, US Army Enginner Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard Wood, MO 65473-8929, released the applicant from active duty for training, discharged him from the Reserve of the Army, and returned him to the Army National Guard.

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated.  A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3.  The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status.  Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, to include his supporting documents, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The proceedings of the Enlistment Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) revealed that the applicant had a medical condition that was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty.  Subsequently, these findings were approved by competent medical authority.  The applicant agreed with these findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.  A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  Further, for Soldiers in entry-level status, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 22 August 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.





















Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 29 August 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070003642

Applicant Name:  Mr.       
______________________________________________________________________


Page 5 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070003642aC071031

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 November 1997, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011389

    Original file (AR20070011389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 4 August 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. A soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001852

    Original file (AR20090001852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/05 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 August 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a left knee meniscal tear, chronic, and in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010710

    Original file (AR20070010710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? In connection with such a discharge, the proceedings of an Enlistment Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) would have revealed that the applicant had a medical condition that was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025019

    Original file (AR20110025019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings, Report of Medical...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012489

    Original file (AR20060012489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 with two (2) attachments. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012072

    Original file (AR20060012072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 060823 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 October 1996, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004783

    Original file (AR20080004783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017072

    Original file (AR20100017072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 November 2009, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, in that he was diagnosed as having a bipolar disorder, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004215

    Original file (AR20120004215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 29 October 2009, the applicant reviewed and concurred with the findings of the Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSB) proceedings, and requested to be discharged from the Army. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.