Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015221
Original file (AR20060015221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 2007/11/13	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See attached DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 03/09/19
Discharge Received:     Date: 03/10/09   
Chapter: 9    AR: 635-200
Reason: Drug Rehabilitation Failure
RE:     SPD: JPC
Unit/Location: Delta Brigade Support Company, 215th Forward Support Battalion Division Support Command, 1st Cavalry Division Fort Hood, Texas 76544 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030512, at or near Fort Hood, on or about 7 February 2003 and 7 March  March 2003, wrongfully used cocaine.  Reduction to E-1, Forfeiture of $575.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 8 November 2003; Extra duty for 45 days: Restriction for 45 days. CG. 

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  71/07/23  
Current ENL Date: 00/08/10    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 02Mos, 00Days ?????
Total Service:  03 Yrs, 02Mos, 00Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63 H 10 H8 Track Vehicle Repairer   GT: 96   EDU: HS    Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSR, ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: Applicant claims he has completed a drug rehabilitation course and is currently attending Platt Medical Training Center where he training to become a medical assistance.  

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      Evidence of record shows that on 06 May 2003, the Clinical Director/ADAPCP staff declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure.  On 19 August 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.   Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.  However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The analyst noted that the applicant was enrolled in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) and was aware of the consequences of any action which would demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program.  As a result of the applicant’s actions and after consultation with the drug and alcohol abuse counselor, the command declared the soldier a rehabilitation failure.  The evidence of record establishes the fact that the applicant was properly counseled and afforded a reasonable opportunity to overcome his problems.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 071130              
Location: Washington DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 1    No change 4   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.?????

Case report reviewed and verified by: Earl Silver, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 071202
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060015221

Applicant Name:  Mr.       
______________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015599

    Original file (AR20070015599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013133

    Original file (AR20090013133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 21 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005826

    Original file (AR20080005826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 May 1999, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000877

    Original file (AR20090000877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003069

    Original file (AR20090003069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 October 1999, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012691

    Original file (AR20080012691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 8 May 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of being an alcohol rehabilitation failure for wrongfully using alcohol while enrolled in the Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention Program (ADAPCP), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009624

    Original file (AR20070009624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006331

    Original file (AR20080006331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 9, alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure. Furthermore, according to AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) codes, the narrative reason for separation should have been "alcohol rehabilitation failure" and the separation (SPD) code "JPD." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006381

    Original file (AR20060006381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007386

    Original file (AR20100007386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed...