Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014825
Original file (AR20060014825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 2006/10/20	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 060425
Discharge Received:     Date: 060602   
Chapter: 3-13    AR: 600-8-24
Reason: In lieu of trial by court martial        
RE:     SPD: DFS
Unit/Location: Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 100th Missile Defense Brigade, Peterson Air Force Base, CO 80916 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier's Overall Record
DOB:  571119  
Current ENL Date: 870527    Current ENL Term: Indef Years       
Current ENL Service:    Yrs,   Mos,   Days      
Total Service:   22   Yrs,   07  Mos,   16  Days      
Previous Discharges: 
USAR 850826-870527/ NA
USAR 880204-951215/ HD
ADT 981218-981225/ HD
ADT 990114-990513/ HD
ADT 990825-000219/ HD
ADT 000321-000806/ HD
Highest Grade: MAJ
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 14A Air Defense Artillery   GT: NA   EDU: College Grad-Master Public Admin   Overseas: Brazil CSC (031017-040117)   Combat: OEF (010928-011223)
Decorations/Awards: ASR / NDSM(2OLC) / GWOT / GWOTE/ OSR / AFRMM/ AAM/ARCOM / MSM (2OLC)/ JSCM/ JSAM (2OLC)
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      
      The evidence of record shows that on 4 April 2006, the applicant was charged with providing false statements to Peterson AFB Installation Security Division (050324), falsifying a marriage license (021012), providing false orders in order to break a lease (041001), unlawfully altered a public record (0206 and 0210), impeded an investigation (051219), wrongfully harbor and shielded an illegal immigrant (0101 to 0210), and under false pretenses wrongfully obtained medical services for said illegal immigrant (050423).   On 10 April 2006, the applicant voluntarily tendered his resignation from the service under the provisions of Chapter 3, AR 600-8-24, resignation for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by a general court-martial or a board of officers.  The chain of command recommended approval of the resignation for the good of the service with issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The Ad Hoc Review Board recommended that the applicant's resignation be accepted with issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 2 June 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 600-8-24 sets the basic authority for Officer Transfers and Discharges.  Chapter outlines the policy and procedure for the elimination of officers from the active Army for substandard performance of duty, misconduct, moral or professional dereliction, and the interest of national security.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with a punitive discharge.  The applicant voluntarily requested resignation in lieu of trial by general court-martial under the provisions of Chapter 3, AR 600-8-24.  The appropriate authority approved the applicant's request and issuance of an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.  The analyst concluded that by his misconduct, the applicant diminished the overall quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 18 December 2007              
Location: Washington D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA 

Witnesses/Observers: NA  

Exhibits Submitted: NA 

VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change   0      No change   5     - Character
		 			      Change   0      No change   5     - Reason
					(Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

Case report reviewed and verified by: Edgar Yanger, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade:      

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official: 
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 20 December 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060014825
Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010842

    Original file (AR20080010842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060810 Discharge Received: Date: 070214 Chapter: 3-13 AR: 600-8-24 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: DFS Unit/Location: 464th Chemical Bde, Johnstown, PA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 4 January 2007, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016426

    Original file (AR20110016426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090310 Discharge Received: Date: 090520 Chapter: 3-13 AR: 600-8-24 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: DFS Unit/Location: HHC, USAREUR/7th Army, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 23 April 2009, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012651

    Original file (AR20080012651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted by the applicant. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 December 2003, the applicant was notified of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of unacceptable conduct for misrepresenting another officer's work as her own during CAS3 course, for submitting a false record of a APFT, for failing to take...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004394

    Original file (AR20080004394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Ad Hoc Review Board met, and on 22 August 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be separated from the U.S. Army with a characterization of service of fully honorable. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records for the term of service under review, the issues and documents that she submitted, the analyst...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000459

    Original file (AR20080000459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The Ad Hoc Review Board met; and on 11 August 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, accepted the applicant's resignation and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicantÂ’s record of service...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708

    Original file (AR20070000708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). On 4 May 2006, the applicant voluntarily...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708aC071031

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). Board Decision The discharge was: Proper...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008162

    Original file (AR20060008162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 07 Yrs, 10 Mos, 17 Days ????? On 14 April 2000, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army for misconduct, moral or professional dereliction, with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicantÂ’s record of service during the term of service under review and considering the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | Ar20060013140

    Original file (Ar20060013140.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 31 May 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013020

    Original file (AR20060013020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 25 July 2000, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicant's resignation, approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The appropriate authority approved the applicant's request and issuance of a general, under than honorable conditions characterization of service.