Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013475
Original file (AR20060013475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 06/09/22	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: ?????

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD293 and attachments.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 03/05/03
Discharge Received:     Date: 03/06/12   
Chapter: 14 para 14-12c    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct 
RE:     SPD: JKQ
Unit/Location: Headquarters, 3d Battalion 7th Special Forces Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 03/03/11 Wrongfully used marijuana, on or between  02/08/01 and 02/12/30; Field Grade. Reduced to E-1 forfeiture of $250 per month for two months, 45 days restriction and extra duty.

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  87/07/10  
Current ENL Date: 01/01/05    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 05Mos, 08Days ?????
Total Service:  02 Yrs, 05Mos, 08Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74C1P Telecommunications Operator   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: Completed a two week substance abuse treatment program.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 06 May 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commision of a serious offense for use of marijuana (on or between 02/08/01 and 02/12/30), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 19 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.  This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct.  The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicant’s characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable.  While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service and his post service accomplishments mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record.  However, the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable.  

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 31 October 2007              
Location: Washington DC 

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: None




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 0    No change 5   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

Case report reviewed and verified by: Earl Silver, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: NA
Other: None
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE: 02 November 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060013475

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013155

    Original file (AR20060013155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015160

    Original file (AR20060015160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-Commission of a Serious Offense for having been convicted by a Summary Court Martial for wrongfully use of marijuana X2, with a general, under honorable condition discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003040

    Original file (AR20090003040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for disrespecting a SGT (071101), failure to report x 4 (070815), (070823), (071112), and (071117); he was cited for driving under the influence in Jefferson County, Kentucky, and he disobeyed a lawful order by driving while his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006753

    Original file (AR20090006753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016221

    Original file (AR20060016221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier's service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008791

    Original file (AR20080008791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 13 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of methamphetamine between (040602 and 040604), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 August 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017497

    Original file (AR20060017497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 April 2001, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. Certification...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016235

    Original file (AR20060016235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for use of illegal drugs-cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011539

    Original file (AR20060011539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and to a personal appearance, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate and senior commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 14 October 2003, the separation authority waived further...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013481

    Original file (AR20060013481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 January 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.