Application Receipt Date: 060616
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 030630
Discharge Received: Date: 030710
Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance And Conduct
RE: SPD: JGA
Unit/Location: FTC 120th AG Bn (Rec) Fort Jackson, SC 29207
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 791103
Current ENL Date: 030212 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 04 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 04 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E1
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 103 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. She was advised of her rights. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 1 July 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, of this regulation, in effect at the time, provided, for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. This provision of regulation applied to individuals who had demonstrated that they were not qualified for retention because they could not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, or because they lacked the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or that they had demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service. The separation policy applies to Soldiers who cannot meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of lack of aptitude, ability, motivation or self-discipline. The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents that she submitted, the analyst recommend that relief be denied in this case. Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not warranted under entry level status. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 25 April 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change (Character)
Change No change (Reason)
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW DATE: 4 May 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060008867
Applicant Name: Ms.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011662
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 August 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (you have no desire to successfully complete basic training, motivation level has been nonexistant and performance has been below average), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008911
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 11 December 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (sociologically unfit and lack self-discipline, and desire needed to complete basic training), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010072
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 961011 Discharge Received: Date: 961023 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010080
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (failure to adapt), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009424
The applicant consulted legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, voted not to change it. Certification...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012028
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 29 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008181
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (his inability to meet the minimum Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) standards), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012082
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 13 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 November 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010212
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011677
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 January 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (Soldier cannot adapt to military lifestyle), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...