Application Receipt Date: 060421
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 041123
Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200
Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure
RE: SPD: JPD
Unit/Location: 3/3rd AR Battalion, Signal ARE N, Fort Stewart, GA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 750928
Current ENL Date: 020521 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06Mos, 03Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 06Mos, 03Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 25F10 (Network Switching Systems Operator) GT: 129 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Kuwait Combat: Iraq (030122-030826)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicant's record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JPD (i.e., Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure) and a Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code of "4." The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records. Procedurally, the unit commander, in consultation with the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) rehabilitation team, would have declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. The applicant would have been advised of his rights and would have consulted with legal counsel. On 16 November 2004, Department of Army, Headquarters, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, GA 31314-5000, issued Orders 321-0006, which discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date: 23 November 2004.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse. A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicants overall record of service. However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army. However, the applicants record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, which was authenticated by the applicant's signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and Government regularity in the discharge process is presumed. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable, and it is recommended that the Board vote to deny the applicant's request in this case.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 070228
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change (Character)
Change No change (Reason)
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. The Board determined that the applicant's length of service to include combat service, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060005774
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010419
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 7 April 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicants overall record of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006532
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure" and the separation code is "JPD." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015140
The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting a change to his narrative reason for separation, however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure" and the separation code is "JPD."
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000199
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. In review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that this condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000135C080324
On 14 November 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013547
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009418
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 15 July 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 11 June...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006381
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005535
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for alcohol rehabilitation failure with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011570
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 18 Days Item 12c on DD Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 18 Days. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...