Application Receipt Date: 060421
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 040608
Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
RE: SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: 632d Maintenance Company, 87th Corps Support Battalion, 24th Corps Support Group, 3d Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Stewart, GA
Time Lost: AWOL 41 days 030903-030904, 040305-040308, 040316-040412, and 040503-040510, record does not show how applicant was returned to military control.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 031029/FTR 030819, 030826, 030919, and 030919/CG
2nd Article 15: 040309/FTR 040106, 040121, and 040123/CG
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 801230
Current ENL Date: 011003 Current ENL Term: 03 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 11Mos, 14Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 09Mos, 03Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ARNG-000906-001023/NA
ADT-001024-010413/HD
ARNG-010414-011002/HD
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 63W10 (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic) GT: 98 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with going AWOL from 3 September 2003 to 5 September 2003, 5 March 2004 to 9 March 2004, 16 March 2004 to 13 April 2004, and 3 May 2004 to 11 May 2004, and the wrongful use of marijuana. On 14 May 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The record is void any recommendation from the applicant's chain of command, however in a memorandum from the staff judge advocate to the separation authority, it stated that the chain of command recommended disapproved of the applicant's request. On 18 May 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and directed that the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted pay grade.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, it is recommended that the applicants request for an upgrade of his characterization of service be denied. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser included offenses under the UCMJ. All the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 070214
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change (Character)
Change No change (Reason)
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070216
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060005751
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 5 pages
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016055
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009991
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016802
On 3 November 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003808
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 July 2007, the applicant was charged with being AWOL (070309 to 090720), failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on diverse occasions between (070223 and 070306), wrongful use of cocaine between (070205 and 070208), and wrongful use of marijuana between (070109...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018687
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, and determined that the record does not support the applicants contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007071
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 22Days ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 30 March...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011577
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007745
Application Receipt Date: 060531 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03Mos, 14Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002537
Applicant Name: ????? While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include the combat service, and the supporting independent medical documents; to include his medical care while on active duty, mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013919
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the Applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.