PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Uncharacterized

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  020530

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  3 Years
    b.  Entry date:  020418
    c.  Age:  32 Years   DOB:  700101


    d.  Educational level:  NIF


    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  NIF                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E3
          0 Year(s)  1 Month  13 Day(s)

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a. Evidence of record shows that on 29 May 2002, DA, HQ, U.S. Army
Maneuver Support Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard Wood, MO,
Orders 149-0355, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective
30 May 2002.  The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which was
authenticated by the applicant.  Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was
discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200 by reason of
failed medical/physical procurement standards, with a characterization of
service of uncharacterized.  The specific facts and circumstances
pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available
records.

      b.  On 30 May 2002, the applicant was discharged.  At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 1 month and 13 days of active
military service in the period under review.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that soldiers who were not medically
qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for
enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards
prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry
training will be separated.  A medical proceeding, regardless of the date
completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by
appropriate medical authority within six months of the soldier’s initial
entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or
temporarily disqualified the soldier for entry into the military service
had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not
disqualify the soldier from retention in the service under the provisions
of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3.  The characterization of service for
soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be
honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level
status.  Army regulation states that a soldier is in an entry-level status
if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable
continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.




                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 050125.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 21
September 2005.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
available record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
All the specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s
separation from the Army are not contained in the available record.  The
record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 which shows the
applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200,
by reason of failed medical/physical procurement standards.  With this type
of discharge the applicant would have been given an Entrance Physical
Standards Board (EPSBD) and been found medically unfit for enlistment with
a physical condition, which existed prior to entry into service.
Procedurally, the applicant would have concurred with the medical board
findings, and requested  discharge.  The applicant’s service was
uncharacterized because she was in entry-level status, i.e., in an initial
probationary period of service.  Any individual who has served for less
than l80 days at the time his or her commander initiated separation action,
and is not being separated for serious misconduct, will be given an
uncharacterized discharge.  An uncharacterized discharge denotes only that
the individual had less than l80 days on active duty.  A fully honorable
discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by
unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or
performance of duty.  In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the
Board determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the
applicant’s record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the
characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.

      b.  Equity:      The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
                   and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
                   equity to change the discharge.  The major factors upon
                   which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
                   and IV of this decisional document.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker

Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




ESMERALDA G. PROCTOR
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  20050001729                   INDEX NUMBERS:  A0143
Date of Review:  050921                                   A0101
Character of Service:  EL
Date of Discharge:  020530
Authority:  AR 635-200 C5
Reason:  A2800
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A