RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 February 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050007949
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. William D. Powers | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Janet Strafer | |Member |
| |Ms. Naomi Henderson | |Member |
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request to change
his retired grade to Lieutenant Colonel (LTC), O-5 with a date of rank of 1
November 1999.
2. The applicant states he was considered for promotion to LTC by a
special selection board (SSB) as a result of reverse discrimination, and
selected, after he retired. His request was denied because the Board said
there was no provision of law to afford him the opportunity to retire as an
LTC since he did not serve in the higher pay grade. However, Title 10, U.
S. Code, section 1370(a)(2)(B) states the President may waive the required
active duty obligation in individual cases involving extreme hardship or
exceptional or unusual circumstances. He cites the subparagraph that
authorized a waiver of the 3-year active duty requirement. The applicant
states his case is unusual because he was no longer on active duty when he
was selected for promotion.
3. The applicant provides his request for an SSB; an extract from Title
10, U. S. Code; and an extract from Army Regulation 600-8-29.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were
summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number
AR20040001371 on 3 March 2005.
2. After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was commissioned
and entered active duty on 5 May 1983. He was promoted to Major
(MAJ) on 1 November 1994. He was subsequently considered but not
selected for promotion to LTC.
3. The applicant was released from active duty on 31 May 2000 in the rank
of MAJ for the purpose of retirement after completing 20 years and 19 days
of creditable active service.
4. On 5 June 2000, the U. S. Court of Federal Claims established, in
Christian v. United States (a case concerning an officer selected by a
Selective Early Retirement Board (SERB) for early retirement), that the
equal opportunity instructions used by the SERB were unconstitutional. On
8 February 2001, that
Court ruled the results of that board are void. As a result of this
decision, section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2002
enacted Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1558 and amended Title 10, U. S.
Code, section 628 to require members challenging unfavorable treatment by a
selection board to apply to their Service Secretary for consideration by a
special board or a special selection board.
5. The applicant applied to the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, acting
for the Secretary of the Army, under the provisions of amended Title 10, U.
S. Code, section 628. He was subsequently selected for promotion to LTC
with a date of rank and effective date of 1 November 1999.
6. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1370 states that, in order to be eligible
for voluntary retirement in a grade above major, a commissioned officer
must have served on active duty in that grade for not less than 3 years,
except that the Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a
military department to reduce such period to a period not less than 2 years
in the case of retirements during the period 1 October 1990 through 31
December 2001.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active
duty on 31 May 2000 and retired in the rank of MAJ after completing 20
years and 19 days of active duty.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion
to LTC by an SSB subsequent to his retirement. He was given a date of rank
and effective date of rank of 1 November 1999. Although his effective date
of promotion is later than his actual date of retirement, had he been
selected for promotion in a timely manner it is presumed he would have
known he had been selected for promotion prior to his retirement date and
he would have elected to remain on active duty to accept that promotion.
3. It is also reasonable to presume that the applicant would have stayed
on active duty until he completed 2 years of active duty as an LTC, on 31
October 2001, at which time he could have received a waiver of the
requirement to serve 3 years as an LTC before retiring as an LTC.
Therefore, it would be equitable to show he would have retired as an LTC on
1 November 2001.
BOARD VOTE:
__wdp___ __js____ __nh____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
amendment of the ABCMR’s decision in Docket Number AR20040001371 dated 3
March 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the
Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he was promoted to LTC effective 1 November 1999;
b. voiding his retirement of 1 June 2000 and showing he remained on
active duty until 31 October 2001 when he was released from active duty for
the purpose of retirement;
c. paying to him all due back active duty pay and allowances as a
result of the above correction with appropriate offsets for any civilian
pay and/or military retired pay he may have received; and
d. showing he was placed on the Retired List on 1 November 2001 in
the rank of LTC, with all due back retired pay to include any cost of
living adjustments.
__William D. Powers___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050007949 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20060216 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. |131.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004153C070206
The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by a special selection board subsequent to his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. determining if he is eligible for restoration to active duty; and b. if he is eligible for restoration to active duty, voiding his retirement of 1 December 1999 and reinstating him on active duty effective 1 December 1999 in the rank of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107124C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result of this decision, section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2002 enacted Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1558 and amended Title 10, U. S. Code, section 628 to require that members challenging unfavorable treatment by a selection board to apply to their Service Secretary for consideration by a special board or a special selection board. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004983C070208
In 2004, apparently as a result of a court order, the applicant was again considered for promotion to LTC by an SSB, acting under Title 10, U. S. Code, section 628, under the promotion criteria for fiscal year 1997. As a result of this decision, section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2002 enacted Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1558 to enable members challenging unfavorable treatment by a selection board to apply to their Service Secretary for consideration by a special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002832C070208
As a result of this decision, section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2002 enacted Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1558 and amended Title 10, U. S. Code, section 628 to require that members challenging unfavorable treatment by a selection board to apply to their Service Secretary for consideration by a special board or a special selection board. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to COL by a special selection board subsequent to his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001888C070208
The evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty on 29 February 2000 in the rank of Major after completing over 21 years of ACS. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by a special selection board subsequent to his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was promoted to LTC effective 1 August 1998; b. voiding his retirement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000042C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty on 31 January 1999 in the rank of LTC after completing 22 years, 9 months, and 12 days of ACS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was promoted to COL effective 1 September 1998; b. voiding his retirement of 1 January...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106180C070208
As a result of this decision, section 503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2002 enacted Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1558 and amended Title 10, U. S. Code, section 628 to require that members challenging unfavorable treatment by a selection board to apply to their Service Secretary for consideration by a special board or a special selection board. Although the applicant specifically states he does not request correction of his records to show he served the additional time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107125C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to COL by a special selection board subsequent to his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was promoted to COL effective 1 September 1997; b. voiding his retirement of 1 April 1997 and showing he remained...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003295C070208
The evidence of record shows the applicant was released from active duty on 30 September 2000 in the rank of LTC after completing 20 years and 5 days of creditable active service. Although the applicant states he does not request correction of his records to show he served the additional time on active duty, such a correction is administratively necessary to facilitate the relief he does request. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028320
With respect to his promotion, the applicant states in a letter addressed to the Secretary of the Army: * Reserve officers were discriminated against since it was the promotion boards' prior determination (a quota system) that all promotions would go to Regular Army (RA) officers and minorities * his non-selection for promotion to COL is a grave injustice * promotion boards were in violation of equal protection and due process rights of persons considered for promotion under the Fifth...